The aim is to show the public how far they can rely on the accuracy of different weather forecasters over periods from a day to a season.
If the weathergirl says you should take a brolly today, should you reach into the cupboard? If the weatherman says you're probably in for a hot summer, should you cancel plans for the Costa del Sunny?
The project has been made more salient by the controversies over weather forecasting during the winter.
There have been long technical debates through the year over the rules of the test.
One forecaster, for instance, objected to being asked to forecast rain over a set number of weather stations in the UK on the grounds that it was very hard to forecast rain on any single spot. It was a better test of skill, the forecaster suggested, to predict rain in a certain grid square, allowing the possibility that a band of heavy rain might narrowly miss the weather station being tested.
The protocol is now going out to public consultation via the web and the public meeting. When the steering group has considered all the responses and agreed on a protocol, they'll invite a selection of forecasters to take part.
has agreed provisionally to join the test, depending on the details of the protocol. The maverick forecaster
also agreed at the last public meeting that he would take part.
The aim is to launch the project by the summer, and publish results over a four-year period.
People wanting to be sure of a place at the open meeting should apply for a (free) ticket via the Royal Institution website, although it is likely that there may be space on the day.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.