Scotland Wales Northern Ireland
BBC Homepagefeedback | low graphics version
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC SPORT
You are in: You are in: Sports Talk  
Front Page 
Football 
Cricket 
Rugby Union 
Rugby League 
Tennis 
Golf 
Motorsport 
Boxing 
Athletics 
Other Sports 
Sports Talk 
Football Talk 
Forum 
In Depth 
Photo Galleries 
Audio/Video 
TV & Radio 
BBC Pundits 
Question of Sport 
Funny Old Game 

Around The Uk

BBC News

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Thursday, 30 August, 2001, 09:20 GMT 10:20 UK
Is Seaman a 'spent force'?
Legendary German goalkeeper Sepp Maier claims England have made a huge error in selecting David Seaman for Saturday's crucial World Cup qualifier in Munich.

At 38, is the England veteran past his prime?

HAVE YOUR SAY

Speaking in a national newspaper, Maier was quick to criticise Sven Goran Eriksson's choice of keeper.

"David Seaman is past his best," Maier told The Mirror.

"He used to be the best keeper in the world, but not anymore."

Indeed, there can be few who have failed to notice a dip in form of late, as Seaman has started to make more and more errors with both his handling and positioning.

So, is Sven right to stick with Seaman or should he let the likes of Leeds United's Nigel Martyn have their turn?

E-mail your views.

HAVE YOUR SAY


We've heard the same old arguments regarding David Seaman for years now. He's too old; he's past his best, blah, blah, blah. Rubbish!! Like a fine wine, David Seaman has improved with age, the Arsenal defence falls apart without him, he's a born leader, top shot stopper and I think he still has fantastic reflexes. Fair do, he has had his share of football gaffes, but if push came to shove - who would you really want to face the Germans in this crunch match? Seaman or his untested understudies?
Dipak, United Kingdom

Seaman is old now, his reactions are dull, his movement slow and he no longer looks sharp. When under pressure he looks likely to concede. It's about time that a younger, fresher keeper took his place, someone that can make those instinctive saves and a little quicker on his feet. Perhaps someone with a better haircut wouldn't go a miss.
Hugh, UK

I have always enjoyed watching Seaman play - but has anyone noticed that he 'went off the boil' as soon as he started growing his hair? Get it cut David and let's see you play like you used to.
Val, England

Can people not open their eyes? Nigel Martyn is and has been the best British Keeper for the last seven or eight years. It's easy to draw upon the Romanian error as a reason not to pick him but in terms of consistency, I'm sure Leeds fans would agree, he is the best (those same individuals don't also remember the two stunning saves he made to keep us in the game!). Coupled with this, his last season, especially in Europe was fantastic; great reflexes, astute positioning and a truly wonderful shot stopper.

In light of this, Seaman can never be number one having shown nowhere near the same form, especially over the last few years. We have to pick on FORM, who is likely to do the best and not rely on glazed memories of Euro '96.
Jim, UK


Nigel Martyn is and has been the best British Keeper for the last seven or eight years
Jim, UK

I have never understood why Seaman was so highly rated; he was never better than mediocre and is now on a downhill slope. There are much better keepers throughout Europe, yet the English always believed they naturally breed the best. It is high time to stop dreaming, to ditch the Seaman myth and to start building for the future, as is happening in all other areas of the English team.
Jake, Switzerland

Who else is there? Every time Martyn gets a game his errors cost goals (Romania, Holland.) Richard Wright needs to displace Seaman at Arsenal first, whilst Flowers and James are in the same mould as Martyn - error prone. Most other Premiership clubs have non-English keepers - so Eriksson would end up dipping into the Nationwide, which I'm sure he wouldn't want to do.
Lee West, England

Of course Seaman should play. He's still by far England's best keeper and all the players respect him. It's purely 'wind up' tactics from the Germans.
Ian Smith, UK

I am the biggest gunners fan I know so it pains me to agree with the general feeling that Seaman is probably just past his prime. However, I say keep him for the remainder of the qualifying campaign and give Martyn the job should we make it to the World Cup. Come on England!
Adrian Beck, UK


I would like to see Wright in goal but until he takes Seaman's place at Arsenal, he should also be reserve goalie for England.
Tom, UK

Seaman is way past his best. He lacks the mobility and reflexes of Euro '96. England should be looking forward rather than hanging on to has-beens like Seaman.
Mark, UK

Maier has made a good point. Fortunately for England, by stating this publicly he has just shot himself in the foot. Seamen will now be fully motivated for the match, and is likely to play a blinder.
Tim, English living in France

Of course he is, and has been for quite some time. Trouble is, the only other keeper consistently good enough to challenge him last season was Richard Wright, who is now his No.2 at Arsenal, unable to prove his potential. Seaman's time as been and gone.
Nathan Hamer, Wales

Seaman is still a great keeper and with club teammates Campbell and Cole in defence there should be good communication. However, Sven should play Mills at right back as he is a stronger defender than either of the Neville brothers, which would mean two Leeds defenders (with Rio playing) and then, by the same logic, Martyn should play. Personally, I would like to see Wright in goal but until he takes Seaman's place at Arsenal, he should also be reserve goalie for England.
Tom, UK


David Seaman should have been dropped after Euro 2000
J Jackson, UK

It is time for Seaman to step down. There are young keepers coming through and it is time for them to be given a chance. He has served us well in the past but a new era must begin.
John Stewart, UK

The English national team has a tradition of sticking with one keeper throughout their World Cup campaigns. The end result is that we have a wealth of goalkeepers who are deprived of international experience. The 'one goalie system must change, otherwise we will find that the young and upcoming stars of tomorrow will opt to play with Wales,Scotland or Northern Ireland in order to gain valuable experience.

Alan Shearer did the decent thing and called it quits when he was on top, I feel that Seaman should follow his example. Nothing can be more humiliating for a man of his vast experience to be told by his country that he is no longer wanted, or good enough.
Julian Hutchings, Taiwan

Seaman is the only real alternative at present. Marytn can be good, but is still too inconsistent. I don't think Seaman will let us down for such a big game!
Phil, UK

David Seaman should have been dropped after Euro 2000. Nigel Martyn is a very capable keeper and Richard Wright could have been given more of a chance in the last two years. I don't think that there is a keeper problem in this country, I just feel that the right people have not been given the chances they deserve. No disrespect to Seaman - his penalty save against Scotland will see him go down in English Football folklore!
J Jackson, UK


Seaman may be a bit slower these days but his experience and positioning make up for it
Steve Hand, England
It's a sad state of affairs when we are so limited on our choice of goalkeepers. We would not be facing a win-or-die situation if David Seaman was awake at Wembley. He cannot even say it was a one-off as Leeds proved the other week. As an ex-goalkeeper, I was always taught to concentrate on the ball at freekicks as well as the wall, and that the freekick could be taken at any time. I agree with Tim Mac-Nocol. We need to get our younger, fitter and nowadays better, goalkeepers into the national team so that if we are to qualify for future tournaments and improve our world ranking, we can do it by using a full squad of young, confident and improving players and not be reliant on older players living off past glories.
Graham Cole, England

David James is not better than David Seaman. He cannot be relied on to not make a mistake. Seaman very rarely makes mistakes, is solid on crosses and commands his area. Seaman may be a bit slower these days but his experience and positioning make up for it. Arsene Wenger sees Wright and Seaman train everyday and he chooses Seaman. Sven sees all the contenders and he still rates Seaman the man for the big occasion. These managers know what they are doing. We can't be risking anything new before in the Germany game.
Steve Hand, England

I think David Seaman is past it. For starters I can't see him still being No.1 for the 2002 World Cup (if England get there). Martyn should be used as a stop-gap until Richard Wright or Paul Robinson can take over after the World Cup.
Matt W, UK

David Seaman will always be selected, because of his heroics in Euro '96. He was at his best then and probably one of the best keepers around. Things have moved on since five years ago, there are much better and younger players about. Look at James, and Wright. If they don't get the chance to play serious matches at top level then they will never get a chance to prove themselves.
Tim Mac - Nicol, GB

Links to more Sports Talk stories are at the foot of the page.

 

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Sports Talk stories

^^ Back to top