| You are in: Athletics |
|
Tuesday, 16 July, 2002, 14:18 GMT 15:18 UK
Moorcroft defends drugs stance
Whitlock has set 37 British records in the pole vault
UK Athletics chief executive David Moorcroft insists the damaging publicity over Janine Whitlock's positive drugs test is a "price worth paying" for ensuring the sport is clean.
The pole vaulter has been left out of Britain's European Championship team after failing a test for anabolic steroids at the Commonwealth Games trials on 16 June.
The drawn-out process before she discovers her fate is set to dominate the build-up to the Manchester event, which starts on 25 July. Whitlock has to:
Whitlock won her sixth successive AAAs title in qualifying for the European Championships on Sunday, but left the stadium in tears, aware of the impending furore.
Moorcroft confirmed the 28-year-old was in the "really early stages" of the process, but stressed his pride in UK Athletics' exhaustive testing procedure. "This is a price worth paying, because it's what we have to do," he said on Tuesday. "Doing the tests we do, there will occasionally be adverse findings. "That's the price we have to pay for being vigilant - and we're proud of the fact we are vigilant. "We have a more vigorous approach than any other sport. "No-one ever likes dealing with doping issues, whenever they are - and particularly in the build-up to the Games."
Whitlock tested positive for metabolites of methandienone, which is found in Dianabol, an anabolic steroid used to improve performance.
She is adamant she has done nothing wrong. "I'm innocent," Whitlock claimed. "I've done nothing wrong and that's the truth. "I can't help what other people think, but I am going to stay strong. It's been a nightmare since I was told but I know at the end of the day I am innocent." Moorcroft also pointed out Whitlock remains innocent unless she is proven guilty at a full disciplinary hearing. "There'll be a decision either way from the scientist before the Commonwealth Games," the chief executive added. "Either the athlete will be able to compete or the athlete will be ineligible through suspension - which isn't guilt and just means there's a case to answer. "Then, if the athlete is cleared at the full hearing, they're okay to compete again. And if they are found to have committed an offence, there is an appeal process beyond that."
|
Top Athletics stories now:
Links to more Athletics stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Athletics stories |
![]() |
||
------------------------------------------------------------ BBC News >> | BBC Weather >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |