|
|
18 Jul 05 11:56 12:56 UK |
A UN group charged with deciding how the net should be run has failed to reach a decision.
The group's report suggests four possible futures for net governance that range from no change to complete overhaul.
The proposals will go forward to a key UN net and society conference due to take place in November.
The report comes as the US says it plans to keep its role as overseer of the net's core administrative body.
Tough choice
The Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) was set up after delegates to the UN's World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) failed to agree on how the net should be run.
Many of those attending the 2003 WSIS meeting in Geneva were happy with the current system in which the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) oversees the running of the net's addressing system.
Others, particularly delegates from developing nations, resent Icann's role and the fact that the US has kept control of it.
Now the WGIG has issued its report about net governance and has tabled four possible futures for what should be done about policy issues, such as spam and hi-tech crime, that fall outside Icann's narrow technical remit.
The one common aspect of all four proposals is the creation of some sort of talking shop that will give governments and others a say in how the net develops.
The four proposals will be sent forward to the second World Summit on the Information Society which is due to take place in Tunisia in November 2005 where delegates will pick their favourite option.
Whatever decision the conference reaches could provoke a clash with the US which in early July renewed its claim to oversee Icann's work.