Mounted police, dogs and officers act as a barrier between the groups of protesters
Freedom of speech is one of the most important principles of any democracy. But when does a lawful protest cross the line into inciting racial and religious hatred?
EDL denies being a racist organisation or being anti-Islamic
On Saturday 10 October, up to 500 supporters of the English Defence League (EDL) gathered in Manchester for a controversial demonstration against Islamic fundamentalism.
Angry scenes followed as lines of police fought to prevent a confrontation with members of Unite Against Fascism (UAF) who occupied Piccadilly Gardens with a larger counter-protest.
In the end, however, there was no serious disorder or violence, with 48 arrests for public order and other offences.
The emergence of the EDL is worrying many people not least because it's very difficult to work out who they are.
EDL insists that it's a non-racist organisation which opposes not Muslims but radical Muslims and has black people among its members.
Mike, a black member of EDL, denied the group was racist
However, the sight of banners reading 'No More Mosques in England', hardly supports that view nor helps to advance city-wide efforts to build racial tolerance between communities.
What is clear is that many observers fear that EDL's stand against Islamic extremism is being used to breed religious and racial hatred.
Searchlight, which campaigns against far-right extremism, says that while EDL may not be an all-white group of hardcore fascists, its banners and chants are anti-Muslim and therefore incite hatred.
Both the Home Office and the police stated that they were powerless to prevent static protests in a public space.
Your comments
Of course the EDL have the right to protest. Muslims, it seems, are allowed to protest against our soldiers risking their lives in Afghanistan and Iraq, and protest how they want to take over our country with Sharia law, and shamelessly advocate converting ordinary citizens to Islam by force. Are you saying that isn't religious or racial hatred?
- Daniel, England
The UAF should not be allowed to counter protest its as simple as that. The only reason we had to spend so much on policing this operation is because the UAF follow the EDL as a means to silence them, preventing FREE SPEECH. They have consent to do this and they even got away with disrespectfully shouting obscenities while the EDF held a 2 minute silence FOR OUR SOLDIERS. The amateurish way in which these issues are being addressed by our politicians is more than worrying. We ALL have a right to protest. I praise the EDL for remaining dignified throughout considering the unreported provocation that they receive.
- Jules, West Midlands
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Bookmark with:
What are these?