Skip to main content Text Only version of this page
BBC
Home
TV
Radio
Talk
Where I Live
A-Z Index
Games
Games
Chat
Chat
Vote
Vote
Win
Win
Quiz
Quiz
Club
Club
 Homepage
 UK
 World
 Sport
 Music
 TV/Film
 Animals
 Sci/Tech
 Weather
 Pictures
 Find Out
 The Team

Contact Us
Help
Teachers





  Arguments for animal testing
Updated 28 January 2004, 14.35
Antibiotics capsules
Practical arguments
  • Animal testing has helped to develop vaccines against diseases like rabies, polio, measles, mumps, rubella and TB.

  • Antibiotics, HIV drugs, insulin and cancer treatments rely on animal tests. Other testing methods aren't advanced enough.

  • Scientists claim there are no differences in lab animals and humans that cannot be factored into tests.

  • Operations on animals helped to develop organ transplant and open-heart surgery techniques
Moral arguments

  • Human life has greater intrinsic value than animal life.

  • Legislation protects all lab animals from cruelty or mistreatment.

  • Millions of animals are killed for food every year - if anything, medical research is a more worthy death.

  • Few animals feel any pain as they are killed before they have the chance to suffer.

More InfoBORDER=0
TeachersBack to animal testing lesson

BORDER=0

Past StoriesBORDER=0
Arguments against animal testing

BORDER=0


 


E-mail this page to a friend



Full Teachers Section
WALES curriculum relevance
NORTHERN IRELAND curriculum relevance
ENGLAND curriculum relevance
SCOTLAND curriculum relevance
Video report:
Child slaves
Why I had to become a refugee
Guide: Asylum seekers
>>BBCi Schools: Loads more citizenship
© BBC Back to top^^
Homepage | UK | World | Sport | Music | TV/Film | Animals | Sci/Tech | Weather
Pictures | Find Out | The Team | Games | Chat | Vote | Win | Quiz | Club