More than 100 nations have reached an agreement on a treaty which would ban current designs of cluster bombs.
Diplomats meeting in Dublin agreed to back an international ban on the use of the controversial weapons following 10 days of talks.
But some of the world's main producers and stockpilers - including the US, Russia and China - oppose the move.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown called it a "big step forward to make the world a safer place".
He announced earlier that Britain would be taking cluster bombs out of service.See how a cluster bomb works
Cluster bombs have been used in countries including Cambodia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Lebanon.
They are made up of a big container which opens in mid-air, dropping hundreds of smaller individual sub-munitions, or "bomblets", across a wide area.
Countries like the US, India, Pakistan and Israel claim such munitions are highly useful on the battlefield, but opponents say that where the bomblets fail to explode they leave a deadly legacy for civilians.
During the conference, delegates have heard first-hand accounts from survivors of cluster bomb attacks.
Speaking at Downing Street earlier, Mr Brown said: "I am delighted that the negotiations in Dublin have come to a successful conclusion and congratulate the Irish Government and all those involved.
"I am confident that this agreement is in line with British interests and values, and makes the world a safer place."
The BBC's Paul Adams said he understood the agreement would outlaw the two types of cluster munitions currently held by UK forces, but would not prevent countries from developing future generations of weapons based on the concept of sub-munitions.
And he said it appeared the UK hoped other countries not present in Dublin, notably the US, might be persuaded to accept the treaty later.
Using British soil
One stumbling block for the treaty could be the stockpile of cluster munitions the US military keeps at bases on British soil.
The British representative in Dublin, John Duncan, said the UK would work with Washington to find a solution to the issue.
But in a statement, the Pentagon stood firm, saying: "While the United States shares the humanitarian concerns of those in Dublin, cluster munitions have demonstrated military utility, and their elimination from US stockpiles would put the lives of our soldiers and those of our coalition partners at risk."
Some campaigners do believe countries like the US will change, however. They cite the landmine treaty of 1997 that was never signed by the US, Israel, Russia or China, yet those nations have not used landmines since it came into effect.
Simon Conway, from the Cluster Munitions Coalition, said there would now be "massive" pressure on the US.
"We think now that all of America's key allies have just renounced the weapon it will be very difficult for the US to engage in operations with countries who have banned this weapon and continue to use them," he said.
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Ed Davey said the prime minister must make clear whether he would continue to allow the US to store its own cluster munitions on British territory.
"If he is serious about ending the scourge of these weapons, he must bring this abuse of the 'special relationship' to an end," Mr Davey said.
Return to top