High Graphics | BBC Sport>>
Front Page |
World |
UK |
UK Politics |
Business |
Sci/Tech |
Health |
Education |
Entertainment |
Talking Point |
AudioVideo |
High Graphics | BBC SPORT>>
Front Page |
World |
UK |
UK Politics |
Business |
Sci/Tech |
Health |
Education |
Entertainment |
Talking Point |
AudioVideo |
UK Contents:
England |
Northern Ireland |
Scotland |
Wales |
Wednesday, 28 November, 2001, 08:46 GMT
Green groups have say over port
Dibden Bay is an important site for wildlife
Wildlife groups are to outline their opposition to a port development within the planned boundary of a new national park, at a public inquiry on Wednesday.
The groups, including the RSPB, English Nature and the Council for National Parks, are concerned valuable wildlife habitats will be destroyed if the proposed Hampshire "super-port" gets the go-ahead.
Associated British Ports (ABP) wants to build on a 202-hectare site at Dibden Bay on Southampton Water near the New Forest. The site is within the boundary of the New Forest National Park.
Commercial organisations including Esso and White Horse Ferries are also expected to make statements on Wednesday.
This mad-cap plan has gone to public inquiry where the massive damage caused by the port, and local objections, will be carefully scrutinised
Tony Juniper, Friends of the Earth
Many local residents are opposed to the proposals and environmental group Friends of the Earth is leading protests against the scheme.
Tony Juniper, director designate of the organisation, said: "This proposed port is unnecessary, unpopular and will cause enormous damage to one of the most sensitive and supposedly protected areas in the UK.
"It is astonishing that such a well-known corporation as Associated British Ports is seriously proposing it."
He added: "At least this mad-cap plan has gone to public inquiry where the massive damage caused by the port, and local objections, will be carefully scrutinised."
English Nature, the government's wildlife advisory group, says the super-port will have a detrimental effect on birds such as brent geese, oystercatchers, ringed and grey plover, curlew, lapwing and teal.
Among the sites that it has argued should not be harmed include:
- Solent maritime region, a candidate for special area conservation (SAC) status and includes the Hamble Estuary;
- Solent and Southampton Water Special Protection Area;
- The River Itchen, a candidate for SAC status.
Richard Leafe, of English Nature, said it objected to the impact the terminal construction scheme was likely to have.
He said: "We would like the inquiry inspectors to fully recognise the harm this development is likely to cause."
Related to this story:
Head to head: 'Super-port' plans
(27 Nov 01 | UK)
Green fears over new port
(27 Nov 01 | England)
Port will 'blight' national park
(10 Oct 01 | England)
Birds may curb port plan
(12 Sep 01 | UK)
Internet links:
Dibden Terminal (ABP) |
Dibden Terminal Inquiry |
Council for National Parks |
Associated British Ports |
English Nature |
Friends of the Earth |
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
High Graphics | BBC Sport>>
Front Page |
World |
UK |
UK Politics |
Business |
Sci/Tech |
Health |
Education |
Entertainment |
Talking Point |
AudioVideo |
High Graphics | BBC SPORT>>
Front Page |
World |
UK |
UK Politics |
Business |
Sci/Tech |
Health |
Education |
Entertainment |
Talking Point |
AudioVideo |
UK Contents:
England |
Northern Ireland |
Scotland |
Wales |
Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©