![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/470000/images/_474853_books150.jpg)
Richard South, a student at Edinburgh University, presented an English literature essay which was based on fictitious experts and sources and which parodied the language of literary criticism.
In response he received a mark equivalent to an upper second class degree, with commendations from the marker.
But the university asserts that its English department has not been fooled by the hoaxer, claiming that the high marks were an acknowledgement of the "orginality" of the approach.
"It is perfectly appropriate for markers to credit a student with originality. It would be inconceivable that specialists wouldn't know that it was a hoax," said a university spokesperson.
The essay, which was not externally marked and will not contribute to the student's degree grade, was in response to the question "Is it valid to read literature historically?"
The student's essay is reported to have included references to two entirely invented academic sources, Parker J Sprague and Professor Levi Erskine-Bloom, Emeritus Dean of Scatology at Trinity College Cambridge.
The university was involved in a mass plagiarism controversy earlier this year, when students in the computing science department were accused of cheating using e-mail and the internet.
Features
Hot Topics
UK Systems
League Tables
Students 'used e-mail to cheat'
(13 Aug 99 | Education)
University in Net cheating probe
(09 Jul 99 | Education)
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Links to other Education stories