Richard Conway and Julian Nicholson had argued that their plan to set up domain names for companies such as Marks & Spencer and Virgin was not "passing off" or trade mark infringement.
![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/135000/images/_138120_Copy_of_Copy_of_courts_of_justice.150jpg.jpg)
But in three Court of Appeal judges have ruled that deputy High Court Judge Jonathan Sumption QC had been right to grant injunctions against their business in November last year.
Five companies - BT, Marks & Spencer, Ladbroke, J. Sainsbury and Virgin - were granted the injunctions after the judge said: "The threat of passing off and trade mark infringement, and the likelihood of confusion arising from infringement of the mark, are made out beyond argument."
In their appeal against the injunctions Mr Conway and Mr Nicholson said the idea was to register Web site names similar to those of well-known companies and then try to sell them to those companies.
The pair denied that their scheme was intended to deceive, infringe trade marks or make money by "passing off" as the companies included in their web site names.
They argued that their actions were no different to those who stockpile old car numbers or buy plots of blocking land to sell to developers and denied doing anything unlawful.
Dismissing their appeal Lord Justice Aldous ruled: "The domain names were registered to take advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of the marks.
"That is unfair and detrimental."
![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/135000/images/_138120_Copy_of__123461_COPY_OF_BRITISH_TELECOM_LOGO150.jpg)
He ruled that "passing off and threatened passing off has been demonstrated".
Lord Justice Aldous said he believed that the names registered by the appellants were "instruments of fraud".
The registered domain names included "ladbrokes.com", "marksandspencer.com" and even "spice-girls.net" and "buckinghampalace.org".
The pair had not told the organisations concerned they were registering the names at a cost of £150 each.
The companies or individuals only knew about it when Mr Conway and Mr Nicholson wrote to them offering the name for sale or hire.
Mr Conway wrote to Burger King offering to sell them the name "burgerking.co.uk" for £25,000 plus VAT, otherwise it would be available for sale to any other interested party.
Next steps for peace
Blairs' surprise over baby
Bowled over by Lord's
Beef row 'compromise' under fire
Hamilton 'would sell mother'
Industry misses new trains target
Quins fightback shocks Cardiff
(From Sport)
Vodafone takeover battle heats up
(From Business)
IRA ceasefire challenge rejected
Thousands celebrate Asian culture
Christie could get two-year ban
(From Sport)
Colleagues remember Compo
(From Entertainment)
Mother pleads for baby's return
Toys withdrawn in E.coli health scare
Nurses role set to expand
(From Health)
Israeli PM's plane in accident
More lottery cash for grassroots
Pro-lifers plan shock launch
Double killer gets life
Cold 'cure' comes one step closer
(From Health)
Straw on trial over jury reform
(From UK Politics)
Tatchell calls for rights probe into Mugabe
Ex-spy stays out in the cold
Blair warns Livingstone
(From UK Politics)
Smear equipment `misses cancers'
(From Health)
Boyzone star gets in Christmas spirit
(From Entertainment)
Fake bubbly warning
Murder jury hears dead girl's diary
Germ warfare fiasco revealed
(From UK Politics)
Blair babe triggers tabloid frenzy
Tourists shot by mistake
A new look for News Online