BBC News Online: UK

'We're not beaten' say N-test veterans

The men claim they were exposed to fall-out during nuclear tests by Britain in the Pacific 40 years ago, causing them lasting illness.

They said the government had acted deliberately to find out what effect radiation would have on them.

The pair took their case to Strasbourg, but the court rejected their claim that the ministry concealed documents which could have won them compensation or a pension.

One of them, 60-year-old Ken McGinley, said they would try to get the decision reviewed on a technical point.

His partner in the action, Edward Egan, 60, said they were not yet beaten by the ruling, from which four of the nine sitting judges had dissented. Their objections were not immediately stated.

He said they were "slightly disappointed" because of the narrowness of the decision, but they hoped to get it reviewed on a technical piont.

The two men were among 12,000 military personnel posted to Christmas Island between 1957 and 1958, when Britain exploded six nuclear weapons into the atmosphere.

But ex-navy-servicemen Mr Egan, who suffers from lung disease, and former Royal Engineer Mr McGinley, who has a blood disorder, were both denied war pensions.

The government claims there was no available evidence that their health complaints were a result of the tests.

The ruling will be a blow to thousands of other servicemen and their families who were hoping a positive result could eventually lead to compensation pay-outs of up to £100,000 each.

The Strasbourg ruling centred on the veterans' claim they were unable to gain access to official documents which they believed might prove a link between the tests and their illnesses.

The fact that these documents were not supplied to them deprived them of access to a pensions appeal tribunal, they argued.

Judge Rudolf Bernhardt ruled that the MoD had not violated the men's human rights by denying them access to documents.

Court had 'no jurisdiction'

And he said the court had no jurisdiction to consider complaints over the alleged lack of protection offered during the tests.

But speaking of the review, Mr McGinley said: "There was a very fine point called Rule Six, where the Ministry of Defence say all we had to do was to contact them and they would release any documentation relating, for example, to radiation levels on Christmas Island.

"That is utter garbage. We're not giving up hope at all."

In this section

Next steps for peace
Blairs' surprise over baby
Bowled over by Lord's
Beef row 'compromise' under fire
Hamilton 'would sell mother'
Industry misses new trains target
Quins fightback shocks Cardiff (From Sport)
Vodafone takeover battle heats up (From Business)
IRA ceasefire challenge rejected
Thousands celebrate Asian culture
Christie could get two-year ban (From Sport)
Colleagues remember Compo (From Entertainment)
Mother pleads for baby's return
Toys withdrawn in E.coli health scare
Nurses role set to expand (From Health)
Israeli PM's plane in accident
More lottery cash for grassroots
Pro-lifers plan shock launch
Double killer gets life
Cold 'cure' comes one step closer (From Health)
Straw on trial over jury reform (From UK Politics)
Tatchell calls for rights probe into Mugabe
Ex-spy stays out in the cold
Blair warns Livingstone (From UK Politics)
Smear equipment `misses cancers' (From Health)
Boyzone star gets in Christmas spirit (From Entertainment)
Fake bubbly warning
Murder jury hears dead girl's diary
Germ warfare fiasco revealed (From UK Politics)
Blair babe triggers tabloid frenzy
Tourists shot by mistake
A new look for News Online