Skip to main content
BBC NEWS / TECHNOLOGY
Graphics VersionBBC Sport Home
News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia | UK | Business | Health | Science & Environment | Technology | Entertainment | Also in the news | Have Your Say |
Wednesday, 21 February 2007, 10:47 GMT

Government backs digital lockdown

Zune music player, Getty

The government has rejected a call to ban the digital locks that limit what people can do with the software, music and movies they own.

A petition calling for the ban on the government's e-petition website gathered more than 1,400 backers.

In its response, the government said these digital locks, known as Digital Rights Management, helped give users "unprecedented choice".

But it added that DRM must respect the rights and needs of consumers.

Official review

In early December the anti-DRM e-petition was put on the part of the Downing Street website set up to let anyone create and gather signatures on an issue important to them.

It called on the government to ban DRM because it "locks users into using a particular service" and stopped them exercising their freedom to choose between competing products.

It acknowledged that there were costs involved in making digital content, such as downloadable music tracks, but it said this could be done in a way that gave a purchaser control over what they could do with this media.

The petition was created by Neil Holmes - a UK member of the Defective By Design anti-DRM campaigning group.

The text of the petition also cited a report from the All Parliamentary Internet Group, released in December 2006, which said steps had to be taken to ensure consumers knew what they could and could not do with digital content they bought.

In its response, the government said it had no plans to ban DRM and said companies should "be able to continue to protect their content in this way".

It said DRM acted as a policeman in that it protected digital content, but, it added, the technology also improved choice and the price consumers wished to pay.

However, the response noted, care had to be taken to ensure that DRM did not dent the needs and rights of consumers.

It also mentioned initiatives emerging from other reviews of copyright law that aimed to make it easier to complain when DRM technology over-stepped what the law allowed.




E-mail this to a friend
Related to this story:
Copyright pirates face crackdown (06 Dec 06 |  Entertainment )
PM denies road toll 'stealth tax' (21 Feb 07 |  UK Politics )
Roads petition breaks a million (10 Feb 07 |  UK )
The petition, the 'prat' and a political ideal (13 Feb 07 |  Magazine )
Will e-petitions change anything? (12 Feb 07 |  UK Politics )
The power of online campaigning (23 Jan 07 |  Special Reports )
MPs in digital downloads warning (04 Jun 06 |  Technology )

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
E-Petition website
Official response to anti-DRM petition
E-petition to ban DRM
Defective by Design
All Parliamentary Internet Group
APIG on DRM
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



SEARCH BBC NEWS: 

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia | UK | Business | Health | Science & Environment | Technology | Entertainment | Also in the news | Have Your Say |

NewsWatch | Notes | Contact us | About BBC News | Profiles | History

^ Back to top | BBC Sport Home | BBC Homepage | Contact us | Help | ©