High Graphics | BBC SPORT>>
Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | AudioVideo |
Health Contents: Background Briefings | Medical notes |

BBC News Online: Health


Friday, 8 March, 2002, 00:13 GMT

Warning over health websites


Internet
Quality cannot always be assured on the web
The quality of health information available on the web has improved, but still cannot be entirely relied upon, say researchers.

The amount of health information available on the internet has exploded in recent years.


" This study confirms our suspicions, but it is a good sign that some sites are getting better "
Dr Paul Cundy

Three separate pieces of research published by the British Medical Journal on Friday examine the quality and authority of available information.

One study found that the standard of information contained in public oriented sites had improved.

However, another concluded that apparently credible websites may not be accurate.

And a third found that most popular websites were not necessarily of the highest quality.

Dr Khalid Khan and his team from Birmingham's Women's Hospital examined the content of 121 websites that provide information on five common health topics:

They found that websites that appeared to be the most credible - that contained information about the source, date and quality of research - were at best only slightly more accurate than other less impressive-looking websites.

A team from the University of Texas focused on the quality of websites giving information about breast cancer.

They found that the more popular websites were not necessarily of higher quality, and were just as likely to contain inaccurate information as less popular sites.

Good news

However, a third study carried out by researchers at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche in Milan, found that the quality of health information on the internet has improved over the past few years.

The Italian team focused on websites giving information about managing fever in children at home.

They initially assessed quality in 1997 and again four years later.

They found that 45% of the new pages adhered to most of the accepted guidelines compared to just 8% of the original papers.

The UK Government has set up a National Electronic Library for Health in response to concerns from the medical profession about the quality of information available on the web.

Benefits

Dr Paul Cundy, a member of the British Medical Association's IT committee, said: "This study confirms our suspicions, but it is a good sign that some sites are getting better."

Dr Cundy said the web did have benefits if used sensibly.

"I advise some people to go on the web. It gives me the opportunity to save time and to do other things.

"For instance, instead of giving men who are worried about whether they should go for prostate screening a 10-15 minute dissertation, I now advise them to look it up on the web, and to come back to me if they still think they need a test."


Related to this story:
Top health websites (17 Dec 00 | Health) WHO bid to regulate health sites (13 Nov 00 | Health) Patients flock to net doctors (25 May 00 | Health)


Internet links: British Medical Journal | British Medical Association | National Electronic Library for Health |
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
High Graphics | BBC SPORT>>
Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | AudioVideo |
Health Contents: Background Briefings | Medical notes |

Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©