There has been considerable pleasure in Moscow at what many analysts - Western as well as Russian - see as a smart move by Russia's military: the placing of Russian soldiers at Pristina airport ahead of Nato forces.
|
|
|
Reports from Moscow suggest that there is mounting frustration in the Defence Ministry.
Russia's soldiers had, after all, just shown considerable flair and imagination and pulled off a major "coup" by placing their men at Pristina airport.
Now, however, Hungary, Bulgaria and other Balkan states have so far refused to open an air corridor for Russia to move in more troops.
Bulgarian Prime Minister Ivan Kostov has said that Russians would only be allowed through if they were to serve in K-For "under a unified command".
Defiance unlikely
According to the Russian Interfax agency unnamed "senior defence officers" have bitterly attacked their own Foreign Ministry for not doing what it could to win an air corridor and "protect Russia's interests".
![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/365000/images/_368791_tanks150.jpg)
It is doubtful if the Foreign Ministry could, in fact, have achieved anything in this regard.
Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary are all keen to join both Nato and the EU and their governments are unlikely to defy the West on this issue.
Western defence experts also question whether the flying of Russian reinforcements into Pristina is such a crucial question anyway.
As they see it, Russia already has what it wants: a presence in Kosovo to back up its demand for its own zone of responsibility in Kosovo, and a separate line of command for its troops there.
Dilemma
Criticism of Russia's Foreign Ministry by military leaders does not seem altogether justified.
But it is clear that the Russian military are still bitter at Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov for accepting the final peace deal in Cologne last week, a deal which accepted all of Nato's five demands.
In the long term both the defence and foreign affairs establishments in Russia are seeking the same thing: resistance to what they see as Nato attempts to minimise Russia's role in the Balkans.
But there is an increasing gulf between them on what methods are the best.
Do you defy the West, as the Defence Ministry wants to do - ignoring your own country's economic weakness and risking an ever deeper diplomatic isolation?
Or do you try to influence the West by constant, tenacious negotiation - and risk being ignored?
Country profiles
Nato discovers mass graves
(14 Jun 99 | Europe)
Serbs flee amid reprisal fears
(14 Jun 99 | Europe)
Serb radicals leave government
(14 Jun 99 | Europe)
British troops find war and peace
(14 Jun 99 | Europe)
War crimes investigators fly in
(14 Jun 99 | Europe)
Serbian media tones down rhetoric
(13 Jun 99 | Monitoring)
Eyewitness: Watching Nato arrive
(13 Jun 99 | Europe)
K-For: The task ahead
(11 Jun 99 | Europe)
Nato
Russian Foreign Ministry
Serbian Ministry of Information
Kosovo Crisis Centre
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Violence greets Clinton visit
Russian forces pound Grozny
EU fraud: a billion dollar bill
Next steps for peace
Cardinal may face loan-shark charges
Vodafone takeover battle heats up
(From Business)
Trans-Turkish pipeline deal signed
French party seeks new leader
Jube tube debut
Athens riots for Clinton visit
UN envoy discusses Chechnya in Moscow
Solana new Western European Union chief
Moldova's PM-designate withdraws
Chechen government welcomes summit
In pictures: Clinton's violent welcome
Georgia protests over Russian 'attack'
UN chief: No Chechen 'catastrophe'
New arms control treaty for Europe
Mannesmann fights back
(From Business)
EU fraud -- a billion-dollar bill
New moves in Spain's terror scandal
EU allows labelling of British beef
UN seeks more security in Chechnya
Athens riots for Clinton visit
Russia's media war over Chechnya
Homeless suffer as quake toll rises
Analysis: East-West relations must shift