The idea of Yugoslavia signing up to the union treaty between Russia and Belarus was first proposed last year by nationalist radicals from all three countries.
|
|
|
But the Russian Foreign Ministry, amongst others, quietly dismissed the idea as both impractical and against Russia's interests.
It was revived again by the Communist speaker of the State Duma, Gennady Seleznyov, who visited Belgrade last week.
![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/315000/images/_317411_bulatovic150.jpg)
Monday's vote in the Yugoslav parliament confirmed the move unanimously - although it amounted more to a vote for Serbia to join the union alone as members of parliament loyal to the President of Montenegro, Milo Djukanovic, stayed away from the session.
It is a measure of how opinion towards the West has changed since the Nato bombings began that the Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said in response that his ministry would "study" the possibility of Yugoslavia joining the union.
That was a much warmer response than before.
Rhetoric or reality?
However, the vote has everything to do with nationalist rhetoric and not a lot with reality.
![[ image: width=150]](/olmedia/315000/images/_317411_slavic_union_150.gif)
The integration between Russia and Belarus, two neighbours with a common border, common language and recent historical ties, is proving difficult enough.
To try to include distant Yugoslavia with its devastated economy, seems fantastic to say the least.
The treaty of economic union signed by the Russian and Belarussian presidents in May 1996, during Mr Yeltsin's re-election campaign has so far yielded few results.
Its main achievement, a customs agreement, has suffered since Russian customs officials complained that the Belarussian frontier was too open to smuggling and Russia was losing revenues.
Last December the two countries declared that they wanted to deepen their integration and work towards full currency union and legal harmonisation - ideas which need to be confirmed in a referendum later this year.
Economists and international lenders like the IMF are very sceptical about closer unions.
The Belarussian economy is still almost exclusively controlled by the state, there is almost no foreign investment and the currency is weak.
These are all problems which are even more acute in Yugoslavia.
Official response crucial
On an issue where symbolism is all-important, the official response in Moscow to the vote will be watched very closely in the West.
Belarus and Yugoslavia are the two most authoritarian and anti-Western states in Europe.
If Mr Yeltsin and his government say they want to show more solidarity with them, it will mark a further toughening of Moscow's position.
Country profiles
Nato defies Russian warning
(10 Apr 99 | Europe)
Russian public demands action
(09 Apr 99 | Europe)
Russia's 'key role' in Kosovo
(07 Apr 99 | Europe)
Russia caught on horns of dilemma
(26 Mar 99 | Europe)
Russian Government
Serbian Ministry of Information
Nato
International Crisis Group
Democratic Republic of Belarus
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Violence greets Clinton visit
Russian forces pound Grozny
EU fraud: a billion dollar bill
Next steps for peace
Cardinal may face loan-shark charges
Vodafone takeover battle heats up
(From Business)
Trans-Turkish pipeline deal signed
French party seeks new leader
Jube tube debut
Athens riots for Clinton visit
UN envoy discusses Chechnya in Moscow
Solana new Western European Union chief
Moldova's PM-designate withdraws
Chechen government welcomes summit
In pictures: Clinton's violent welcome
Georgia protests over Russian 'attack'
UN chief: No Chechen 'catastrophe'
New arms control treaty for Europe
Mannesmann fights back
(From Business)
EU fraud -- a billion-dollar bill
New moves in Spain's terror scandal
EU allows labelling of British beef
UN seeks more security in Chechnya
Athens riots for Clinton visit
Russia's media war over Chechnya
Homeless suffer as quake toll rises
Analysis: East-West relations must shift