Skip to main content
BBC NEWS / ENTERTAINMENT
Graphics VersionBBC Sport Home
News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia | UK | Business | Health | Science & Environment | Technology | Entertainment | Also in the news | Have Your Say |
Entertainment Contents:  Arts & Culture

Friday, 21 April 2006, 08:19 GMT 09:19 UK

Friends cleared over dirty jokes

The cast of Friends Dirty jokes and sexual conversation among the writers of hit sitcom Friends did not amount to sexual harassment of an assistant, a US court has ruled.

The California Supreme Court has rejected a claim by Amaani Lyle, 32, who transcribed the writing sessions.

"Sexual antics and sexual discussions" by the show's writers were not aimed at Ms Lyle, Justice Marvin Baxter decided.

Ms Lyle's lawyer claimed women were seen as "playthings for males who want to demean them and make fun of them".

She worked on the show for four months in 1999 but was fired because she could not transcribe the discussions fast enough, according to producers.

Writers' fantasies

"I would have to listen to comments about the sexual conduct many of the writers would like to do with Courteney Cox and Jennifer Aniston," Ms Lyle said.

A panel of seven justices unanimously ruled that she could not sue Warner Bros Television.

"Lawsuits like this one... present a clear and present danger to fundamental free speech rights"
Justice Ming Chin

Justice Ming Chin said the case had more to do with the US Constitution's First Amendment right to free speech than sexual harassment.

"The First Amendment protects creativity," he wrote in the ruling.

"Lawsuits like this one, directed at restricting the creative process in a workplace whose very business is speech related, present a clear and present danger to fundamental free speech rights."

'Creative workplace'

The panel of justices said the bawdy comments were made in a "creative workplace where writers generated scripts for an adult-oriented comedy show featuring sexual themes".

But the remarks and jokes "were not aimed at plaintiff or any other female employee", Justice Marvin Baxter wrote.

"There is no dispute Friends was a situation comedy that featured young sexually active adults and sexual humour geared primarily toward adults.

"Aired episodes of the show often used sexual and anatomical language, innuendo, wordplay and physical gestures to create humour concerning sex," he wrote.

A spokesman for Warner Bros Television said: "Now we can continue doing what we do best, writing and producing hit television shows with the knowledge that our speech is protected."



E-mail this to a friend
Related to this story:
Friends stars 'mocked by writers' (28 Apr 04 |  Entertainment )
Worker alleges Friends harassment (23 Apr 04 |  Entertainment )
Turner fuels Friends reunion talk (28 Jan 06 |  Entertainment )
Friends finale draws record 8.6m (29 May 04 |  Entertainment )
Friends climax watched by 51m (07 May 04 |  Entertainment )
Parting company with Friends (07 May 04 |  Entertainment )

RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
California Supreme Court
Friends on Warner Bros Television
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



SEARCH BBC NEWS: 

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia | UK | Business | Health | Science & Environment | Technology | Entertainment | Also in the news | Have Your Say |
Entertainment Contents:  Arts & Culture

NewsWatch | Notes | Contact us | About BBC News | Profiles | History

^ Back to top | BBC Sport Home | BBC Homepage | Contact us | Help | ©