Page last updated at 17:29 GMT, Friday, 9 October 2009 18:29 UK

Lives 'ruined' by rape allegation

Coat of arms
The jury at the High Court in Perth judged the woman had consented

A group of men cleared by a jury of gang raping a 21-year-old woman have called for their accuser to be named.

Currently, the Scottish media do not name victims of alleged sexual offences.

The jury at the High Court in Perth found Steven O'Rourke and James Hyndman not guilty of raping the woman.

Co-accused Robert Miller and Ryan Dunn had earlier been cleared of the same charge after the Crown dropped proceedings against them.

Speaking outside court at the end of a nine-day trial, Mr Dunn said it was the four men who were the victims. He said: "It is completely unfair that we have all been named and been made out to be animals when it was all a pack of lies.

She should be the one in the dock for making all of this up
Ryan Dunn
Man cleared of rape claim

"She is just an attention-seeker and she should be named and shamed for what she has done to us. It has ruined our lives while it has been hanging over us.

"It has affected not just us, but our families and friends as well. She should be the one in the dock for making all of this up."

The woman, from Bathgate, claimed she had been gang-raped by four men at her former home in the West Lothian town on 11 February and that they had threatened to kill her.

The High Court in Perth heard that the woman had invited them all back to her home and then engaged in group sex with three of them.

Mr Dunn revealed that the group sex had ended when the woman, who admitted downing several vodkas, bourbons and apple liqueurs, became concerned about her kitten.

He said the change in atmosphere led to the men throwing items out of the fourth floor window, which sparked the woman's call to the police.

But the jury preferred the men's account that she had consented to intercourse with three of them.

Consent advice

A spokesperson for the Crown Office said: "After consideration of all the facts and circumstances, Crown Counsel decided there was sufficient evidence to indict James Hyndman, Steven O'Rourke, Robert Miller and Ryan Dunn for assault to severe injury and rape.

"As the trial progressed, Crown Counsel reached the view that the evidence available to the court was insufficient in law to continue proceedings against Robert Miller and Ryan Dunn, and accordingly the libel against them was withdrawn.

"There was sufficient evidence for the charges against James Hyndman and Steven O'Rourke to be considered by the jury. The verdict was entirely a matter for the jury."

Jan Macleod, from the Women's Support Project in Glasgow, said: "This case highlights how important it is that men are absolutely clear about when a woman has given her consent.

"This is especially true when it involves a group of men and one woman."



Print Sponsor


RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC iD

Sign in

BBC navigation

Copyright © 2017 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific