BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in: UK: Scotland
Front Page 
World 
UK 
England 
Northern Ireland 
Scotland 
Wales 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Saturday, 13 October, 2001, 11:55 GMT 12:55 UK
Law review call after Beggs conviction
Beggs graphic
Beggs' has been in prison before for violent attacks
A Conservative MSP has called for a legal review in the wake of William Beggs' life sentence for the murder of Kilmarnock teenager Barry Wallace.

Phil Gallie said that the legal process, which allowed Beggs to walk free from a previous murder conviction in England, should be overhauled.

Beggs was convicted of murdering 28-year-old Barry Oldham and trying to dismember his body in 1987 but the verdict was quashed on appeal.

Mr Gallie said that Beggs should have faced a re-trial instead of being allowed to walk free.

William Beggs
Beggs' earlier murder conviction was quashed
At the trial in December 1987, Beggs insisted the killing of Barry Oldham was self-defence.

The Crown applied to try him on a number of wounding charges involving other men alongside the murder charge.

The judge at his trial, at Teesside Crown Court, allowed the application - but two years later, the Court of Appeal said he was wrong to have done so.

This decision set Beggs free and in the years ahead he was involved in several other violent attacks before Friday's conviction for the murder of Barry Wallace.

Phil Gallie told BBC Radio Scotland's Newsweek programme that Beggs' release in 1989 for a similar crime highlighted the need for a legal review.

Phil Gallie
Phil Gallie: "Public safety"
The Conservative MSP for Central Scotland said: "I am particularly concerned by the actions of the Appeal Court and that time after time they seem to pick up on technicalities as an excuse for overturning verdicts that have been achieved in court with the considerations of jury and trial judge.

"It seems to me that this is a matter we should be examining with some intensity."

He added: "I think it is right that there should be an appeal process but perhaps we should take an example from the (Michael) Stone case down south where in that particular case there was a re-trial.

"Perhaps the Appeal Court should not have the ability to overthrow a verdict that has been achieved in reasonable fashion.

"My argument has always been that the safety of the public must be our goal as far as our justice system goes."

See also:

12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Life for limbs-in-loch murderer
12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Slashing victim 'expected to die'
12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Family condemn "devil" killer
12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Beggs' catalogue of violent crime
12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Former student tells of Beggs terror
12 Oct 01 | Scotland
Beggs trial: Timeline
28 Sep 01 | Scotland
Woman 'found head on beach'
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Scotland stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Scotland stories