![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, June 3, 1998 Published at 12:04 GMT 13:04 UK UK Politics: Talking Politics The role of the Monarchy ![]() Proposals need the approval of the Queen as well as the House of Commons and the House of Lords in order to become law By BBC Constitutional Affairs Correspondent Joshua Rozenberg. The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy. A monarch is a hereditary ruler; a constitutional monarchy is a state headed by a monarch who rules according to the constitution. The constitution may be unwritten, as it is in the United Kingdom, or codified as it is in almost all other monarchies. In a constitutional monarchy, the sovereign reigns but does not rule. Almost all of the Queen's constitutional powers are exercised on the 'advice' of her government. The advice she receives cannot be ignored: in practice, it is the Queen's ministers who make almost all the decisions. Sovereignty resides not in the sovereign but with 'the Queen in parliament'. That means proposals need the approval of the Queen as well as the House of Commons and the House of Lords in order to become law. In practice, however, parliament is supreme. Once a bill has been passed by both houses of parliament, the royal assent is always signified. The monarchy could not survive any attempt to block legislation. The last monarch to use her veto was Queen Anne, in 1707. The Queen is Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Head of the Commonwealth. These positions have symbolic importance. However, it would be wrong to imagine that the monarch is little more than a figurehead. The Sovereign has important powers, and may still be called upon to exercise them. Under the British constitution, the monarch:
Since the Second World War, we have become used to clear-cut election results. One party normally has an absolute majority in the House of Commons - sometimes large, sometimes very small. The elected leader of that party is appointed prime minister. However, at the general election after next, the United Kingdom might adopt a system of proportional representation for elections to the House of Commons. If that happens, we can expect to see 'hung' parliaments - where no party has an overall majority. As Professor Vernon Bogdanor reminds us, the sovereign's personal prerogatives would then become of real importance. It is easy to imagine a situation where the leader of each of the two biggest minority parties - whichever those parties might be - was offering to form a government with the support of a wavering third party. The monarch's decision might then be crucial - and in practice there would be no ministers to call upon for advice. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||