BBC Political Correspondent Ben Wright's 2008 look at the pageantry and political significance of the occasion
Written by the government and delivered by the reigning monarch, the Queen's Speech sets out the legislative agenda for the year ahead and is the centrepiece of the state opening of Parliament.
Each session of Parliament begins with this royal address and covers the following year.
In most years it takes place in November.
But every time there is a general election, Parliament is dissolved and the Queen's Speech takes place shortly after the government comes to power, as happened in 1997, 2001 and 2005.
The ceremonial trappings surrounding the speech make the event one of the high points of the parliamentary calendar, unrivalled in its spectacle and tradition despite some of the more arcane practices having been toned down in recent years.
The Queen normally attends the state opening in person and delivers the speech from the grand throne in the House of Lords.
Her speech does not set out the entirety of the government's programme, however.
The Budget and the pre-Budget report have also been increasingly used to set out strategy and announce new measures.
The decision over what to put in or leave out of the Queen's Speech is a politically crucial one, usually the subject of months of political wrangling within government as ministers fight for their favoured measures to win a slot in the crowded legislative agenda.
This year's process will have been more rushed than normal because it is less than 10 days since the government came to power.
Typically a Cabinet committee - which includes the leaders of the Commons and Lords, the chief whip and chief law officers - helps decide on content the Queen's Speech, with the prime minister having the final say.
Negotiations this time around are likely to have been especially sensitive as this is the first coalition government for 65 years and both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats want to see their policy priorities reflected in the legislative plan.
The limited parliamentary timetable - and the time it takes for large bills to pass through examination by committees in the Commons and Lords - usually means not all desired measures can be included.
Delaying keynote measures can create its own difficulties, with late bills in danger of running into the parliamentary buffers of the end of the session.
Bills which fail to pass through all their parliamentary stages by this point fall, and have to be reintroduced from scratch in the next session. However this is less of an issue for a government in its first year in office.
Although the government controls the Parliamentary timetable through its majority in the House of Commons, several factors can derail or change its plans.
First of all, the House of Lords - whether or not it has a government majority - can reject government bills, sending them back for review to the House of Commons.
Although the government can reverse Lords decisions, the time it takes to do this can slow down progress on other parts of its programme.
In addition, the opposition can seek to delay measures. This is a tactic which can only be effective when the government has a small and unstable majority and is unable to use its "guillotine" to cut off further debate.
And the government's own backbenchers might seek to defeat the government on certain unpopular measures.
In addition to the plans set out in the Queen's Speech, the government might agree to add extra bills - including those proposed by private members who come high on an annual ballot each year - to its own programme.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.