Brown Iraq inquiry evidence disingenuous - Lord Boyce
Gordon Brown: "A very considerable amount of money was spent"
Former heads of the armed forces have strongly challenged Gordon Brown's evidence to the Iraq war inquiry.
The prime minister, who was chancellor when the war began, said the military had been given everything it asked for.
But Lord Guthrie, ex-chief of the defence staff, said in the Daily Telegraph that armed forces had been denied a request for more helicopters.
His successor, Lord Boyce, told the Times Mr Brown had been "disingenuous". No 10 rejected the criticisms.
Downing Street insisted that Mr Brown could not have been clearer in his response to questions about military funding.
It also repeated his statement that no request for equipment had ever been turned down.
But another former defence chief - General Sir Richard Dannatt - told the BBC that while the prime minister may have been "narrowly and precisely correct" on his evidence on military spending, he had not addressed the issue of "underlying underfunding" going back to 1997.
Lord Guthrie, who held his post from 1997 to 2001, wrote in the Telegraph the Ministry of Defence (MoD) had "received the bare minimum from the chancellor, who wanted to give the military as little as he could get away with".
He said: "The whole defence budget was extremely difficult to run in his time.
"For Gordon Brown to say he has given the military all they asked for is not true.
"They asked for more helicopters but they were told they could not have any more."
Lord Guthrie added: "He cannot get away with saying 'I gave them everything they asked for'. That is simply disingenuous."
Lord Boyce, who was chief of the Defence Staff up to the beginning of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, echoed his former service colleague's attack: "He [Gordon Brown] is dissembling, he's being disingenuous. It's just not the case that the Ministry of Defence was given everything it needed.
Nice try prime minister to say that we had everything we wanted
"There may have been a 1.5 per cent increase in the defence budget but the MoD was starved of funds."
Gen Dannatt, who retired as Chief of General Staff last year and now advises the Conservatives on defence issues, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Nice try prime minister to say that we had everything we wanted. But that only applies to the very narrow point of the additional costs of operations."
He said Mr Brown had been correct when it came to Treasury funds for the additional costs of equipment - the so-called Urgent Operational Requirements (UOR).
But he said this was a "narrow" point, and there had been underlying underfunding going back to 1997-98.
"Defence inflation runs higher than normal inflation so when additional money has gone to defence over the years, the spending power of that money has reduced," he said.
"In 2003, the Treasury reopened an agreement on funding it had with the Ministry of Defence and effectively cut £1bn out of our budget year on year."
The Liberal Democrats say inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot should publish Treasury documents to clear up the row.
During his evidence to the Iraq Inquiry on Friday Mr Brown said he had fully backed the 2003 invasion of Iraq and had been kept "in the loop" by Tony Blair during the the build-up to war.
At any point, commanders were able to ask for equipment that they needed
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.