Page last updated at 10:09 GMT, Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Church gay ceremonies ban lifted

Couple holding hands
Civil partnerships were legalised in England and Wales in 2004

Peers have voted to lift the ban on same sex couples holding civil partnership ceremonies inside churches.

The House of Lords agreed an amendment to the Equality Bill which would allow, but not compel, religious organisations to host the occasions.

Gay rights campaigners celebrated the change, but opponents said it could be impractical and undermine marriage.

Peers voted by a majority of 74 in favour of the amendment, which was not backed by the government.

It is yet to be approved by the Commons, but it is thought to be unlikely that MPs would make any significant changes.

'Religious freedom'

Labour peer Lord Alli proposed the amendment, telling the Lords: "There are many gay and lesbian couples who want to share their civil partnership with the congregations that they worship with.

"And there are a number of religious organisations that want to allow gay and lesbian couples to do exactly that."

We, like the government and the courts, have been quite clear ever since civil partnerships were introduced that they are not the same as marriage
Bishop of Bradford

He said: "In the end it comes down to an issue of religious freedom."

It was not an "attack" on the Church of England or the Catholic Church, he added.

Lord Alli said: "Religious freedom requires us to let others do things that we ourselves would not do. Religious freedom cannot begin and end with what one religion wants."

Lords leader Baroness Royall and Conservative equality spokesman Baroness Morris of Bolton, a Roman Catholic, both spoke against the amendment but later abstained.

Lady Royall warned of potential practical difficulties which would have to be addressed in later regulations.

Ben Summerskill, chief executive of gay rights group Stonewall, said: "We are absolutely delighted with this vote for religious freedom. It will be warmly welcomed by lesbian and gay people of faith.

"We regret the government spoke against equality but we hope they will now do the necessary drafting with urgency."

'Next steps'

Lord Alli's cross-party amendment was co-sponsored by Tory finance spokesman Baroness Noakes, retired judge and crossbench peer Baroness Butler-Sloss and crossbencher Baroness Campbell of Surbiton.

But the Bishop of Bradford, the Rt Rev David James, who voted against the amendment, warned of "unintended consequences".

He said: "When we consider changes to the law, we need to be clear about what they are meant to achieve and what, in practice, they do achieve."

He said there had been "no practical difficulties so far" with the existing legislation, adding: "The fundamental difficulty that many churches and faiths will have with this arguments is that we, like the government and the courts, have been quite clear ever since civil partnerships were introduced that they are not the same as marriage."

Other opponents included Conservative former cabinet ministers Lord Tebbit and Lord Waddington.

A Government Equalities Office spokesman said: "Baroness Royall made the government's position clear during the debate; we're now considering what steps to take next."

Civil partnerships were legalised in England and Wales by the Civil Partnership Act of 2004, which came into force the following year.



Print Sponsor


SEE ALSO
Parliament gets wedding licence
15 Feb 10 |  London

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC navigation

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific