Iraq inquiry: 45-minute claim 'asking for trouble'
Sir David was intelligence co-ordinator under Tony Blair
Claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction which could be used within 45 minutes in a dossier was "asking for trouble", the Iraq inquiry has heard.
Tony Blair's former security co-ordinator Sir David Omand said some intelligence figures were "queasy" about publishing intelligence details.
He said it was a "local colour" the secret service would allow to be used.
And he said the government was warned that action in Iraq could draw "large numbers" to Islamic extremism.
Sir David, who was security and intelligence co-ordinator from 2002 to 2005, was asked about the September 2002 dossier on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction.
It included the controversial claim that they could be used within 45 minutes which was at the centre of a row between the BBC and the government.
Sir David said it was a piece of intelligence that was circulated "quite late in the day".
AT THE INQUIRY
Peter Biles, BBC World Affairs correspondent
The controversy surrounding the September 2002 dossier on Iraq just will not go away.
Sir David Omand revealed the detail about how the dossier was drafted by the JIC, and the consequences of the foreword written by Downing Street.
The JIC chairman, Sir John Scarlett, had been determined to retain "ownership" of the text of the dossier.
The faults had come to rebound on the JIC, but Sir David said the overall approach had been vindicated when the later "dodgy dossier" was published in February 2003 under the eye of No 10's spin-doctor, Alastair Campbell.
Sir David recalled how he had marched into Mr Campbell's office to ask what was going on, and had been given an apology.
Tomorrow, some of these issues will no doubt be raised with the former Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, when he gives evidence to the inquiry.
He said there was a "natural queasiness" among some in the intelligence community at making details public and there was a risk "we would end up with a document that was simply a series of assertions".
"That is my personal explanation of why, as it were, people fell on the 45 minutes - at least that was something the secret service would allow to be used," Sir David said.
"And, with hindsight, one can see that adding a bit of local colour like that is asking for trouble but we didn't really spot that at the time."
He said statements in the dossier had not been tightened up and Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) chairman John Scarlett would have told him if he was being put under undue pressure.
The committee has been looking at Tony Blair's foreword to the dossier, in which the former PM wrote that he believed the intelligence had established "beyond doubt" that Saddam Hussein had continued to produce chemical and biological weapons.
Sir David said he thought he had not paid much attention to the foreword - as it was a document produced by the prime minister under his own name - but that had been a "mistake".
'Unwilling to admit'
It had also been a "big mistake" to combine "the making of the case by government... with the presentation of the summary and what the JIC had found".
"I certainly wouldn't recommend doing it again," he said.
Sir David also said the JIC had not "stepped back" in January 2003 to reassess intelligence on Iraq's weapons - when the UN inspectors had not found any.
"When the inspectors started to report that they weren't finding what we thought was going to be found, the response, for example in SIS [the Secret Intelligence Service], was simply to turn up the volume control to say, 'That just proves how devious Saddam Hussein is and how incompetent the inspectors are'."
There was a clear difference within Washington between the CIA and its own analysts and those inside the Pentagon
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.