Page last updated at 14:47 GMT, Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Bid to reveal 'torture' evidence

Binyam Mohamed
Mr Mohamed, a British resident, claims he was tortured

Lawyers acting for a UK resident being held at Guantanamo Bay are launching a new High Court bid to have alleged evidence of torture made public.

Binyam Mohamed, 30, says he was tortured before being flown to the US detention camp in Cuba.

Last week, judges refused to order the disclosure of a summary of US reports on his detention, citing a threat to US intelligence-sharing with Britain.

The US denies that evidence against Mr Mohamed was obtained through torture.

Ethiopian national Mr Mohamed is the last recognised British resident to be held at Guantanamo Bay.

He had lived in the UK since the age of 15, but was arrested in Pakistan in 2002.

He claims he was secretly flown to Morocco and tortured before being moved to Afghanistan and finally, in 2004, to the US naval base in Cuba, where he remains, although charges against him were dropped last year.

'Misleading evidence'

Earlier, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones had ruled that some parts of papers referring to Mr Mohamed should remain secret, following the threat from the US to halt the sharing of information on terrorism.

In making the decision the judges criticised that threat, saying it was "difficult to conceive" that a democratically-elected and accountable government could rationally object to the summary of Mr Mohamed's treatment by US agencies being published.

However, they said Foreign Secretary David Miliband believed there was a "real risk" that the potential loss of intelligence co-operation would seriously increase the threat from terror faced by the UK.

Mr Miliband later insisted there had been "no threat" from the US.

He added that confidentiality was key to intelligence sharing, a view backed by the White House.

Mr Mohamed's solicitors, Leigh Day and Co, and human rights campaign group Reprieve are now attempting to persuade the judges to reconsider their decision.

When information is passed to any democracy governed by the rule of law it will be recognised that its courts might, in certain circumstances, order its disclosure
Richard Stein
Leigh Day and Co

They argue that the court relied on misleading evidence provided by the UK government.

"In court, disclosure was resisted because of US threats to downgrade the security relationship if it was disclosed," said Richard Stein, partner at Leigh Day and Co.

"Now it is said, by the Foreign Secretary, to be because of a mutual understanding about how intelligence material is treated.

"In light of the weight given by the court to the 'threat', that is a substantial difference.

"When information is passed to any democracy governed by the rule of law it will be recognised that its courts might, in certain circumstances, order its disclosure.

"One of those circumstances would be where, as in this case, it discloses evidence of torture."

The US denies that evidence used against Mr Mohamed was obtained through torture.

Today's preliminary hearing is expected to be brief, providing directions and a timetable for a full hearing in the near future.

On Monday, US military lawyer Lt Col Yvonne Bradley flew to Britain to urge the Foreign Office to press harder for Mr Mohamed's release.

Print Sponsor

'Torture' case lawyer comes to UK
09 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
Tory pressure over 'torture' case
06 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
Miliband defends secrecy stance
05 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
Spotlight on special relationship
04 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
'No torture pressure' - Miliband
05 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
Ministers face torture pressure
04 Feb 09 |  UK Politics
Profile: Binyam Mohamed
04 Feb 09 |  UK
Guantanamo inmate charges dropped
21 Oct 08 |  Americas

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit


Sign in

BBC navigation

Copyright © 2019 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific