Page last updated at 14:20 GMT, Thursday, 16 October 2008 15:20 UK

Change urged for danger zone aid

Afghan woman in Kabul
DFID spends more than 1bn a year on aid to 'insecure' countries

The government's aid work in dangerous countries needs to change if it is to be more successful, a report by Whitehall's spending watchdog says.

Projects which rely on work with local agencies are open to corruption because it was dangerous to keep a check on them through site visits, it said.

In one Iraq project, 500,000 was lost due to fraud involving local officials.

The Department for International Development said it was reviewing the way it works in fragile states.

The report from the National Audit Office said DFID is diverting increasing sums of aid - more than 1bn a year - to "insecure" countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Sudan.

Year-long fraud

It said in some areas, like healthcare, it had made progress but was failing to make major advances on tackling poverty in the most dangerous countries.

Part of the problem was a reliance on local government agencies and voluntary organisations for projects where it was hard to make site visits to guard against corruption.

The report said two-thirds of projects it reviewed "had problems arising from weak partner capacity".

One example was a 4m project to create jobs in southern Iraq in which 500,000 had to be written off because of a year-long fraud involving local officials.

It is clear that DFID needs to learn new skills and up its game
Andrew Mitchell
Shadow international development secretary

The report said after the security situation had deteriorated to such an extent that planned spot checks became impossible and in some provinces "the number of work days created was far lower than sub-contractors reported".

In the end DFID investigations "reported reasonable confidence that 1m of the 4m had been spent as planned. There was either a lack of evidence or indications of misuse for the remainder."

The report said: "Higher risks run in insecure environments have led to lower project success rates."

And it was not clear how assessments of conflicts in "insecure" countries then influenced the way projects were managed.

"In order to improve the effectiveness of aid operations, DFID needs to apply the lessons from practical experience more quickly, for example by better assessing and managing security risks and finding new ways to keep track of progress when site visits are dangerous," the report said.

'Vulnerable people'

The NAO also said more could be done to improve the safety of DFID staff, highlighting an incident in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, where staff and consultants were trapped in their homes when fighting erupted.

One staff member later said it was "only by the grace of God" none of them had been killed or seriously injured.

NAO head Tim Burr said: "DFID staff work hard, often in difficult and dangerous situations, to deliver real benefits to some of the world's most vulnerable people.

We take whatever steps we can to make sure that British taxpayers' money is being spent effectively
Douglas Alexander
International development secretary

"DFID could still make better use of its teams' growing experience in this field to adapt standard aid practices to meet the challenges presented by insecurity."

Shadow International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell said: "Today's report makes clear that DFID needs urgently to improve its performance in conflict zones like Iraq and Afghanistan. It is clear that DFID needs to learn new skills and up its game."

He praised staff but said "radical policy and management improvements" were needed.

A spokesman for DFID said it was finalising a review of the way it works in insecure environments and fragile states.

Later International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme that they were "by very definition, very difficult environments in which to work".

"That's why we are consistently looking at our systems, constantly monitoring the resources and making sure that we take whatever steps we can to make sure that British taxpayers' money is being spent effectively."

But he added: "It is a matter of real pride in the Department for International Development that the bodies charged with examining international aid agencies ... pretty much regard Britain's Department for International Development as the gold standard in terms of spending money effectively."


SEE ALSO
'Too few checks' on UK aid funds
08 Feb 08 |  UK Politics
Rural poor 'being short-changed'
10 Jan 08 |  UK Politics

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC navigation

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific