Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Archive
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Tuesday, June 29, 1999 Published at 16:21 GMT 17:21 UK


UK Politics

Concessions hint on info bill

Critics say the draft bill would make it harder to access infromation

Ministers may re-think a key part of their draft Freedom of Information Bill after being stung by criticism from MPs and campaigners.

Home Office minister Lord Williams of Mostyn has signalled that the government is willing to consider strengthening the test that officials would have to use before deciding whether to release information to the public.

Under the draft bill some material could be withheld from the public if its release was deemed likely to "prejudice" the working of government.

Lord Williams told a Lords committee, which is examining the bill, that the government would give "careful consideration" to toughening the test so that information could only be kept secret if there was a risk of causing "substantial" harm.

However, he stressed the final decision would lie with Home Secretary Jack Straw.

If agreed, the move could help placate critics who have claimed the draft bill would actually reduce the public's right to obtain information from public bodies.

Ministers defend bill


[ image: Lord Williams of Mostyn:
Lord Williams of Mostyn: "We're not as bad as we painted"
Lord Williams said the government had been "disappointed" by some of the opposition to the bill.

"I don't think we are as bad as we are always painted," he told the committee.

Mr Straw indicated earlier this month that the government was willing to re-think some of the most controversial areas of the widely-attacked draft bill.

Lord Williams said he was "personally uneasy" about parts of the bill that would impose blanket exemptions on disclosing certain information.

But he maintained that the government was correct to lay conditions on who the information was granted to and to what use it could be put.

Inquest material disclosing that someone was suffering but had not died from Aids could be released to the family, but not necessarily to a tabloid newspaper, he said.

"I personally believe that some information, although it should be disclosed, should not be disclosed to the world at large," he said.

He told peers there was more of a "culture of inertia" in Whitehall than a culture of secrecy.

Maurice Frankel of the Campaign for Freedom of Information welcomed Lord Williams's willingness to re-think the harm test.

"It's good to hear they are saying they are reconsidering," he said.

"They seem to have been taken completely by surprise that the public, having discovered there's no right to know in the bill, are very unhappy about it."



Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©


UK Politics Contents

A-Z of Parliament
Talking Politics
Vote 2001

Relevant Stories

22 Jun 99 | UK Politics
Straw denies information bill 'betrayal'

26 May 99 | UK Politics
Information fight continues

24 May 99 | UK
Freedom of Information: USA vs France

24 May 99 | UK Politics
Straw denies information bill 'retreat'





Internet Links


Government freedom of information draft legislation



The Campaign for Freedom of Information

Charter88


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.




In this section

Livingstone hits back

Catholic monarchy ban 'to continue'

Hamilton 'would sell mother'

Straw on trial over jury reform

Blairs' surprise over baby

Conceived by a spin doctor?

Baby cynics question timing

Blair in new attack on Livingstone

Week in Westminster

Chris Smith answers your questions

Reid quits PR job

Children take over the Assembly

Two sword lengths

Industry misses new trains target