Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Archive
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Friday, March 26, 1999 Published at 20:53 GMT


UK Politics

Lord Chancellor breaks discrimination law

Lord Irvine: Failed to advertise job of special adviser

An industrial tribunal has found that Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, indirectly discriminated against a black female lawyer when he appointed a white, male friend as his special adviser.

The tribunal in south London found in favour of immigration lawyer Jane Coker who argued that Lord Irvine's appointment of Garry Hart was unlawful as the post had not been advertised.


[ image: Garry Hart: Long-time friend]
Garry Hart: Long-time friend
But the panel cleared him of direct discrimination - the deliberate choice of one person over another on the grounds of sex or race.

It also rejected allegations of racial and sexual discrimination brought by another female lawyer, Martha Osamor.

Lawyers for the lord chancellor had argued that the appointment of special advisers was exempted from civil service regulations and he was not required to advertise the post.

Lord Irvine himself did not attend the tribunal saying it would only add to the publicity surrounding a case he claimed had no merit.

After the hearing, Ms Coker called for a change in the way the government appoints staff.

"Our case has shown that this government's procedures for appointing special advisers discriminate unlawfully against women and black people," she said.

"There are 69 special advisers to this government. This decision goes to the heart of central government. It must change now to begin to comply with its stated commitment to equal opportunities."

Call for Lord Irvine to quit

She and her fellow lawyer Ms Osamor said the Lord Irvine should resign because he had broken the law.

And their solicitor Jane Deighton added to their calls for him to go. "The disdain with which he treated women and black people is matched only by the arrogance with which he has treated the law and these proceedings.

"He's the head of the legal system. This decision means he has to resign," she said.

Blair's role

The complainants had tried to implicate the prime minister himself on the grounds that Lord Irvine had discussed the appointment with him.

However, the tribunal ruled it was too late to name Tony Blair as a respondent in the case.

The Lord Chancellor's Department said it would be considering an appeal against the ruling.

Earlier this month the lord chancellor provoked controversy after he admitted using government stationery to invite friends to a private funciton at London's Garrick Club.

And last year he outraged taxpayers by spending £650,000 upgrading his official residence.



Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©


UK Politics Contents

A-Z of Parliament
Talking Politics
Vote 2001

Relevant Stories

20 Mar 99 | UK
New drive to recruit ethnic judges

02 Mar 99 | UK Politics
Irvine invites new row





Internet Links


Lord Chancellor's Department


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.




In this section

Livingstone hits back

Catholic monarchy ban 'to continue'

Hamilton 'would sell mother'

Straw on trial over jury reform

Blairs' surprise over baby

Conceived by a spin doctor?

Baby cynics question timing

Blair in new attack on Livingstone

Week in Westminster

Chris Smith answers your questions

Reid quits PR job

Children take over the Assembly

Two sword lengths

Industry misses new trains target