BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in: UK Politics
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Interviews 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Friday, 23 November, 2001, 16:24 GMT
UK troops' limited Afghan role
British Marine
Troops will not be deployed en masse, sources say
UK troops are unlikely to deploy in large numbers in Afghanistan, senior defence sources have said.

Officials said it was not certain whether any further UK ground troops would be needed beyond a small number of Royal Marines and Special Forces already deployed in the war-torn country.


It remains far from clear if there is a role for any additional UK armed forces to go to Afghanistan

Whitehall source
And it is thought that even if further deployment of troops was undertaken it would be nowhere near the scale of the 6,000 members of the forces currently on 48 hour stand-by.

"Almost certainly nothing like that number would deploy, even if a political decision was made to deploy," one source said.

"It remains far from clear if there is a role for any additional UK armed forces to go to Afghanistan.

"The desirability of additional forces is not yet at all certain."

Mixed signals

News that troops will not be sent to Afghanistan in large numbers comes after a week in which there were mixed signals from Whitehall on the issue.

Prime Minister Tony Blair had suggested that around 4,000 troops were on standby last week to go in as part of an international stabilisation force.

Clare Short
Ms Short called for troops to secure supply routes
Following the deployment of members of the Special Boat Service at Bagram airport, the number of troops put on a heightened state of alert was upped to 6,000.

Meanwhile there was growing impatience about the hampering of the humanitarian effort.

International Development Secretary Clare Short told a Commons committee that unless troops were sent in to secure supply routes there would be an humanitarian crisis.

That followed warnings by aid agencies that local warlords were hampering aid efforts.

But MOD officials insisted on Friday that troops were not needed to get supplies through.

Awareness

"I think there is a greater awareness of the true situation regarding the humanitarian problem," one said.

"There is not necessarily a role for significant numbers of the military forces to enable or protect aid. That is a revelation of the last few days."

The decision to put troops on 48-hour deployment notice was so they could react to the speed of political decisions, he added.


Key stories

Background

War view

TALKING POINT

FORUM

SPECIAL REPORTS
See also:

21 Nov 01 | UK Politics
Straw set for new diplomatic drive
22 Nov 01 | Middle East
UK mission to Afghan neighbours
21 Nov 01 | UK Politics
Minister hits out at troop delay
21 Nov 01 | UK Politics
US-UK tensions over aid effort
20 Nov 01 | UK Politics
US 'turning its back' on poverty
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more UK Politics stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more UK Politics stories