Page last updated at 13:33 GMT, Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Group wins fight to save Coatham Common in Redcar

Coatham Common
Part of the common was used as a golf course

Campaigners have won a six-year fight to block a £55m development on green space off the Teesside coast.

Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council had wanted to build more than 300 houses, a sports centre and a swimming pool on the town's Coatham Common.

But the UK Supreme Court has now ruled it should be registered as a village green following an appeal by the Friends of Coatham Common group.

A public inquiry had wrongly ruled it did not meet criteria, judges said.

Plans for the Persimmon Homes development were first unveiled by the council in 2004, and the public inquiry was held when campaigners tried to register the land as a village green.

We have finally won the day
Councillor Charlie Davis

Residents were required to demonstrate they had used the land "as of right" for sports and other pastimes over a period of 20 years.

But the planning inspector found that they had failed to use the site "as of right" because they had deferred to golf club members by allowing them to play their shots on part of the common used as first and eighteenth holes.

The council's decision to follow the public inquiry's findings and not to register the land was subsequently upheld in the High Court and Appeal Court.

'Worthy memorial'

However, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday, following a three-day hearing, that the planning inspector had "misdirected himself" in the significance of residents showing "civility" to the golfers.

Councillor Charlie Davis, of The Friends of Coatham Common, said: "This is amazing. After years of battling to save this green space, where generations of Coatham people have played football and cricket, we have finally won the day.

"We now call on the council to work with us to make this green space a worthy memorial to our greatly-missed late MP, Mo Mowlam."

Councillor George Dunning, leader of Redcar and Cleveland council, said the authority was "disappointed" with the Supreme Court's decision.

He said: "This means we won't be able to progress the regeneration of Redcar as quickly as we would have liked.

"We are meeting with Persimmon Homes next week to consider the options available to us."

Print Sponsor

Q&A: UK Supreme Court
30 Sep 09 |  UK
Move to block development fails
15 Jan 09 |  Tees
Public supports 55m development
12 Dec 05 |  Tees
Redevelopment plan is 'high risk'
29 Jun 05 |  Tees
Exhibition opens on 55m project
14 Feb 05 |  Tees

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Northern Echo Court saves common from housebuilding - 6 hrs ago Supreme court saves Teeside village green - 14 hrs ago
Hartlepool Mail Town's residents win landmark battle over open space - 16 hrs ago
Times Online Deference does not stop use as of right - 17 hrs ago

Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit


Sign in

BBC navigation

Copyright © 2019 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific