[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Thursday, 7 June 2007, 11:56 GMT 12:56 UK
Pair guilty of hunting with dogs
PA file photo of Quantock Staghounds leader Richard Down (left), and whipper-in Adrian Pillivan. arrive at an earlier hearing
Down (l) and Pillivant (r) had denied contravening the Hunting Act
Two men have been found guilty of illegally hunting deer with hounds.

Huntsman Richard Down, 44, and whipper-in Adrian Pillivant, 36 of the Quantock Staghounds were convicted at Bristol Magistrates' Court.

Anti-hunt campaigners filmed two hounds chasing deer on Exmoor. The League Against Cruel Sports (LACS) said the deer were chased for more than an hour.

Both men had denied contravening the Hunting Act, which came into force in February 2005.

The defendants were hunting for sport and recreation to continue their way of life and are disingenuous in attempting to deceive me into believing that they were exempt from hunting
District Judge David Parsons

The LACS said it launched the prosecution because no attempt was made to shoot the deer humanely or call off the hounds during the hunt.

Spokesman Douglas Batchelor, said: "Justice has prevailed today (Thursday) in what was a clear-cut case of blatant law-breaking by hunters who believe themselves to be above the law.

"The hunting fraternity must grasp what the British public have understood ever since the ban was introduced - chasing and slaughtering stags for pleasure is totally unacceptable in a civilised society.

"To do so is a criminal act as these two gentlemen have discovered today."

Down, 44, of Bagborough, Somerset, and Pillivant, 36, of Willand, Devon had argued throughout the trial that they had been hunting the deer within the law.

District Judge David Parsons said their argument was "disingenuous" and fined both men 500 and ordered them to pay 1,000 each as a contribution towards costs.

He said: "Neither defendant has established on the balance of probability that he reasonably believed the hunting was exempt.

Video evidence

"The defendants were hunting for sport and recreation to continue their way of life and are disingenuous in attempting to deceive me into believing that they were exempt from hunting."

The LACS had played the court video evidence of 20 deer being chased with dogs at a hunt meet at Longstone Hill, Somerset, last February.

Richard Furlong, representing the League, had told the court: "They made no attempt to call the dogs off.

"The facts of this case are that no reasonable person could have believed this was exempt from the Hunting Act.

"They made no attempt to control the dogs."

Robbie Marsland, UK director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), welcomed the decision.

He said: "This is the second time that the league has taken and won a private prosecution and IFAW congratulates them for that.

"In the light of this ruling it is very difficult to see how anyone could go out stag hunting in the belief that they are acting lawfully.

"The Hunting Act is showing its teeth. There have been a number of prosecutions under the Act and more are in the pipeline, including one being taken by Avon and Somerset Police against the Devon and Somerset Staghounds, expected later this summer."




SEE ALSO
Huntsmen could face prosecution
08 Sep 06 |  Somerset

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific