Page last updated at 19:33 GMT, Friday, 31 October 2008

Activist DNA evidence disputed

Mel Broughton
Animal rights activist Mel Broughton is standing trial in Oxford

The defence in the trial of an animal rights campaigner accused of fire-bombing Oxford University buildings has questioned the use of DNA evidence.

Mel Broughton, 48, from Northampton, is on trial at Oxford Crown Court and denies all the charges against him.

A key defence witness has challenged the validity of the use of microscopic DNA samples found on a petrol bomb at Templeton College in February 2007.

Doctor Allan Jamieson told the court such minute samples were "unreliable".

Earlier in the trial the prosecution said the so called "low-template" or "low count network" (LCN) DNA samples found on the petrol bomb at Templeton College matched Mr Broughton's DNA profile.

The LCN DNA evidence is crucial to the prosecution's case.

On Friday the jury spent the day listening to evidence from a number of forensic experts on this type of DNA analysis.

They heard that last year the use of LCN DNA evidence was suspended while a report was carried out into how it was independently assessed.

Dr Adrian Linacre who co-wrote the report, which was subsequently published in April 2008, appeared as an expert witness for the prosecution.

He explained to the court how LCN DNA analysis worked. He also said the use of such complex statistics can cause "problems for jurors".

"Insurmountable" problems

Dr Jamieson, who was called as an expert at the Omagh bomb trial in 2007, was called as a witness for the defence.

Scene of crime officers bringing out petrol bombs found at Templeton College, Oxford
The DNA evidence being disputed was taken from a sample found on bombs found at Templeton College

He said there were "insurmountable" problems with low template DNA analysis.

With regards to the microscopic sample which was found to match Mr Broughton's DNA, he said: "This sample of DNA is the minimum size that can be measured."

He disputed prosecution claims that there was only a one-in-one billion chance that the DNA found could belong to someone else.

"It was possible that the sample could match Mel Broughton," he said.

"But it was also possible the DNA belongs to someone other than Mr Broughton."

He also said he was not certain it was sufficient evidence against a defendant.

Mr Broughton, of Semilong Road, Northampton, denies charges of conspiracy to commit arson.

He has also pleaded not guilty to an alternative charge of possessing articles with intent to destroy property and keeping an explosive substance with intent.

The case continues on Monday.



Print Sponsor


SEE ALSO
Animal rights activist remanded
14 Dec 07 |  Oxfordshire

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC iD

Sign in

BBC navigation

Copyright © 2017 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific