[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Tuesday, 11 September 2007, 11:56 GMT 12:56 UK
Author voices national park fears
Bill Bryson
Bill Bryson is president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England
Beautiful countryside could be "lost forever" if parts of Hampshire and Sussex are left out of a South Downs National Park, campaigners have said.

The claim has been voiced by author Bill Bryson, president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), who made a fact-finding visit to the area.

Mr Bryson said he was "shocked" 371 sq km of land in East Hampshire and the Sussex Downs could be omitted.

A public consultation on the national park runs until 24 September.

The area was first designated as a national park in 2002, followed by a two-year public inquiry.

The process was put on hold in 2005, and then restarted in July but with the boundaries of the proposed park redrawn.

The CPRE said a planning inspector had recommended reducing the overall size by 23%, with the East Hampshire and Sussex Downs areas of outstanding natural beauty (AONBs) left out.

Increased funding

Mr Bryson said: "I was shocked to see the planning inspector's argument to exclude a large tract of land known as the western Weald.

"If this beautiful landscape is left out, it will run the risk of being picked off by developers and lost forever.

"It has also been recommended that the historic market towns of Petersfield in Hampshire, and Midhurst, Petworth and part of Arundel in Sussex, be excluded.

"Where is the sense in excluding these settlements which have such strong historic and cultural links with the South Downs?"

South Downs (copyright: Murray Downland Trust)
The proposed national park runs from Eastbourne to Winchester

The CPRE wants Environment Secretary Hilary Benn to return to the original wider boundary.

Spokeswoman Emma Marrington said the western Weald would not necessarily benefit from any greater protection under national park status, but explained that the current scenario would leave it exposed.

She said: "It's very likely it would face de-designation as an AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty), because you couldn't justify it remaining as a smaller one if it's not beautiful enough to be included in a national park.

"Developers could potentially have a field day and the landscape would really suffer."

Ms Marrington added that the main benefit of national park status was more funding towards promoting recreational enjoyment of the areas.

The smaller park is also being opposed by the South Downs Campaign, the Council for National Parks and Hampshire County Council among others.




VIDEO AND AUDIO NEWS
Author Bill Bryson looks at National Park plans



SEE ALSO
National park changes criticised
29 Aug 07 |  Hampshire
National park boundaries revised
02 Jul 07 |  England

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific