Page last updated at 08:36 GMT, Sunday, 7 December 2008

Part-time school starts supported

classroom
Sir Jim said parents should be able to make an "informed choice"

Children in England born in July or August should be able to start school part time if their parents want them to, a government study will recommend.

Statistics have long suggested those born in August do less well in exams than those born the previous September.

But Sir Jim Rose's study will reject NUT suggestions that summer-born children should have a delayed start.

Instead, he will say all should start in the September after they turn four, but only part-time for the youngest.

'Elbowed out'

At present, children in England and Wales in many local authorities are expected to start school in the September after their fourth birthday.

However, some authorities delay school life for younger children until after Christmas, while others make use of part-time starts.

Sir Jim was asked to examine the issue by Children's Secretary Ed Balls following concerns about children born in the summer doing less well than their older classmates.

Teachers shouldn't mix up maturity with ability
Ed Balls
Childrens' Secretary

His interim report, to be published on Monday, will say it is better for children to start school as early as they can - so long as they have attended good nursery schools.

"Parents need to be given the facts so they can make an informed choice about when their child starts school because evidence suggests it can have a major impact on the rest of their life, particularly if they come from a disadvantaged background," Sir Jim said.

"But we also need to be sure that teachers are giving younger children the right support and are not letting them get elbowed out by older youngsters."

His report will suggest children could be eased into school life by attending only in the mornings or afternoon, for 15 hours a week, at first.

'Radical solution'

Mr Balls said he recognised parents' concerns about their children being taught alongside older pupils.

"Teachers shouldn't mix up maturity with ability," he said.

"I don't want a child wrongly held back as being low ability in primary school when it's their age that's the problem."

Christine Blower, the National Union of Teachers' acting general secretary, said a more radical solution would be to follow the example of Scotland and Wales and end national testing in English primaries.

"It is quite obvious that summer-born children lose a year in their education, but the current system treats all children as if they were all born in the autumn term," she said.



Print Sponsor


SEE ALSO
Rose denounces impact of testing
20 Oct 08 |  Education
Is five too soon to start school?
08 Feb 08 |  Education
Primary curriculum to be reviewed
09 Dec 07 |  UK Politics
Summer-born to start school later
09 Jan 08 |  Education
What will curriculum review mean?
11 Dec 07 |  Education
Summer-born pupils 'doing worse'
24 Oct 07 |  Education

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC navigation

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific