[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Friday, 2 March 2007, 00:00 GMT
School ballots 'no help to poor'
parents walking children to school
Poorer parents were more likely to walk to school
Lotteries will not raise the likelihood of young children from less affluent homes getting places in popular schools, researchers have suggested.

Parents had neither a car nor the time to take them any distance to school, Newcastle University academics found.

Middle-class families did - and were more likely to have the motivation to take up places in non-local schools.

The study also found that almost all the parents interviewed had been happy with the process of choosing a school.

"This contrasts with the frequent media coverage of parental anxiety to secure a place in a 'good' school," their report said.

The study - the results of which have not yet been published - was carried out by Dr Helen Jarvis and Dr Seraphim Alvanides.

'Damaging'

It focused on primary schools but they believe the findings would apply equally to secondary schools.

HAVE YOUR SAY
We should concentrate on fixing the schools that are broken
Mike, Luton

The lottery issue has been highlighted by the decision of Brighton and Hove Council to use such a system as a tie-break in allocating places at over-subscribed schools within their catchment areas.

Dr Jarvis said: "Our research suggests that lotteries of over-subscribed school places would produce the worst of both worlds - greater educational polarisation and longer, more environmentally damaging car journeys to distant schools by middle-class parents."

She said it was interesting that Labour-controlled Brighton was proposing it on the grounds of fairness and equality of opportunity, when this research suggested it might have exactly the opposite result.

Happiness

She and Dr Alvanides looked at 50 primary schools in Newcastle and selected two for intensive study, one in an affluent part of the city, the other in a deprived area.

They worked closely with 10 families from one school and eight from the other.

All but two of the 18 had been allocated a place at their "first choice" school.

None of the poorer families owned a car and walked their children to school, whereas most of the affluent families had two cars and drove there.

When preparing their applications almost all the poorer families had visited just one school, their priority being a "happy child". They paid little heed to future secondary school transfers.

The better-off families had visited two or more, some going to five or more - including private schools - in their search for a "good school". They spent a lot on after-school activities.

The researchers believe they have uncovered significant lessons, most importantly on "the false view that policy makers have of the way parents in different walks of life make choices (assuming they have choices to make) about their children's education".




SEE ALSO
Split on school places lottery
28 Feb 07 |  Education
School admissions rules finalised
10 Jan 07 |  Education
My struggle for a school place
01 Mar 06 |  Education
Lottery of school places backed
29 Sep 05 |  Education
Tough choices on school places
22 Jul 04 |  Education

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific