Wednesday, October 20, 1999 Published at 12:44 GMT 13:44 UK
Kent warned over cost of ending grammars
The campaigns against selection are hotting up
The education authorities in Kent have been told to stop using 'misleading' figures for the cost of ending selective secondary education in the county.
Conservative-controlled Kent - which has the largest concentration of grammar schools in England - has long said that ending selection in the county could cost it £150m.
The local anti-selection campaign in Kent, Stop the 11-Plus (Step), has repeatedly challenged the £150m figure. It complained to the Department for Education in London about the matter.
In a reply this week, the department said it did "remain concerned at the use of the £150m figure as the estimated cost of reorganisation in Kent."
David Shand, of the department's grammar school ballots team, referred in his letter to comments by the vice-chairman of Kent's education committee, Leyland Ridings.
"The report Mr Ridings quotes highlighted several possible options, of which the 'worst case scenario' suggested that costs could possibly reach £150m," he wrote.
"The department feels that this is somewhat different from Mr Riding's suggestion and that there is a risk that the £150m could be misinterpreted as being the actual cost following any ballot in favour of ending selection.
"We have therefore asked that any future material which uses this figure makes the context clear."
The whole issue of selection was raised by the Conservative Party in a Commons debate on Wednesday morning.
Allowing parents to vote on whether selective schools in their area should become comprehensives was a "one-way ratchet" that actually denied choice, said Tory MP Graham Brady.
"Now we are stuck with a flawed procedure which is loaded against the remaining grammar schools," he said.
Remaining grammar schools had been placed in a "state of peril".
"It certainly isn't true when Labour MPs say this is about parental choice - parents are free to chose not to have a grammar school but they not free to have a grammar school."
One Labour MP, Ben Chapman, said he had attended a grammar school and would vote to keep them.
"If our grammar schools are doing a good job ... let's leave well alone. If they ain't broke, they don't need fixing."
"It is a centrally co-ordinated campaign by egalitarian hooligans and educational vandals who want to destroy what exists and what works, in favour of an untried and untested method which happens to conform to the egalitarian prejudices of members of the Labour Party," he said.
The Education Minister Estelle Morris said it was no longer good enough to give just the top 25% of children a good education. The government was determined to deliver the best for all.
"The challenge which faces this nation now and the challenge which faces the education service is no longer good education for the few and the top 25%," she said.
"It is how we get a schools system which raises standards for every single child and make sure that 24,000 schools are good."