[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Wednesday, 10 September, 2003, 14:23 GMT 15:23 UK
Minister's tough message on fees
By Angela Harrison
BBC News Online education staff

Alan Johnson
Alan Johnson: "Fees fair"
The government has said it is convinced its plans to allow universities to raise tuition fees are the right way forward.

Rebel Labour backbenchers are threatening to block the plans when they come to the Commons in December.

They say fees of up to 3,000 a year would deter children from poorer families from going to university.

But the Higher Education minister, Alan Johnson, told the heads of the UK's universities the proposals were fair and would be brought in, "touch wood".

Mr Johnson said officials were "putting wet towels on heads" to try to help those from poorer families.

Up-front fees abolished

Under the government's proposals, universities would be able to vary tuition fees up to a limit of 3,000 a year, although these would only be paid once a student had graduated and was earning over 15,000 a year.

GOVERNMENT PLANS
Means-tested 1,000 grants from 2004
Upfront tuition fees end 2006
Fees then rise to 3,000 a year
First 1,125 subsidised for poor
Payable from graduate salary of 15,000+
Zero-rated student loan up to 4,000 a year
New access regulator
Teaching-only "universities"
Research funding for the elite
50% participation through foundation degrees
Those from the poorest families currently do not have to pay the existing flat rate tuition fees of 1,125 a year.

They will still be exempt from that amount and will benefit further from the new proposals by getting a maintenance grant of 1,000.

Mr Johnson said all those who were "serious" about higher education funding accepted the fact that the taxpayer could not be expected to contribute more than the 400 a year they were already putting in to universities.

Tuition had been free and grants had existed for most of the last 40 years but the gap between the proportion of middle class and working class youngsters going to university had actually widened, he said.

VICE-CHANCELLORS' REACTIONS
Prof Graham Upton, Oxford Brookes, was impressed by the government's apparent willingness to talk about areas of disagreement such as the split between research and teaching
I think the government made a mistake by capping so low. In due course the cap will come off
That was not the fault of universities.

"I use this to chide those who say that the only solution to getting youngsters from disadvantaged backgrounds into higher education is free university education and generous grants."

Universities UK as a body has welcomed the plans, accepting that extra direct funding through taxation is not likely.

Its president, Professor Ivor Crewe, told its annual gathering, at the University of Warwick, that vice-chancellors recognised that students and parents were worried about debt.

Prof David Melville, Kent:
Most vice-chancellors are now in favour of fees in the form that they are now being proposed and discussions will be about the detail

Prof Stephen Bailey, Nottingham:
Personally, I think that universities should be able to charge more because of the need for increased flexibility in the system
But he said some fears were based on misconceptions.

The message had not got through that low-income students would only have to pay fees once they were "well-paid graduates".

But the government could do more to help the poorest students.

"The government should rationalise what has been called the dog's breakfast of existing special grants in order to increase the maintenance grant and to widen its eligibility.

Higher grants

"And it should reform the current loan system so that students are less dependent on expensive credit card and bank debt."

Concerns about poorer students were raised by university leaders from the conference floor.

Diana Green, the vice-chancellor of Sheffield Hallam University, said she was concerned about the "potential barrier" of debt aversion.

"The government should be making more money available for maintenance grants," she said.

But Mr Johnson replied: "We haven't got any more money to make maintenance grants higher but at some future time, of course we will continue to look at maintenance grants."

We are amazed the minister has chosen to show such contempt for the views of the majority
Student leader Mandy Telford
His department said later its position remained the same as in its response to the education select committee report on its plans.

This was that student support was being kept under review, but the most likely area for future movement was fee remission - that is, increasing the amount that poorer students are exempt.

The president of the National Union of Students, Mandy Telford, said: "Coming a day after the TUC unanimously condemned top-up fees and a poll showed that 80% of the general public oppose them, we are amazed the minister has chosen to show such contempt for the views of the majority.

"To talk about higher education as a market and students being forced to pay what a market dictates is an affront to those students who are already struggling by on a daily basis.

"To not understand why a working class 18 year old would be put off racking up a debt of 20,000-plus, further demonstrates just how wrong the government is on this issue."




SEE ALSO:
Clarke defends higher tuition fees
02 Sep 03  |  Education
Graduates 'facing huge debts'
13 Aug 03  |  Business
Universities campaign for top-ups
07 Aug 03  |  Education


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific