BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh

 You are in: Education
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Hot Topics 
UK Systems 
League Tables 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

Wednesday, 8 August, 2001, 16:11 GMT 17:11 UK
Heads' letter warns of AS-level confusion
David Hart
David Hart expresses concern over AS-level results
7 August 2001

The Rt Hon Estelle Morris MP
Secretary of State
Department for Education & Skills
Sanctuary Buildings
Great Smith Street

Dear Estelle

I am writing in advance of next week's publication of the AS level results because of the distinct danger that an inadequate and distorted picture will be presented. Our concerns can be summarised as follows:-

1. The main complication with AS levels is that they only become a qualification (and publishable as such) if and when a candidate accepts an AS Certificate, ie. "cashes in" the three AS unit results in any subject.

The rules, as we understand it, stipulate that if the 3 units are cashed in for an AS qualification, the only way that the AS result can be improved further is by the student re-taking all 3 units.

On the other hand, if a student decides not to accept the Certificate, and does not cash in, they can retake 1, 2 or 3 units in order to improve their AS results.

2. The only apparent benefit in cashing in is to enable the student to show the AS level qualification on the UCAS form in their application to Higher Education.

Since it is perfectly possible for a candidate to state that their "results are being held over" as part of their personal statement in the UCAS form, the balance of argument is against cashing in until this becomes necessary.

3. Of equal concern is that, when it comes to publication of the results, the cashing in process was complicated further at the examination entry stage when the question was asked on the entry forms whether AS results would be cashed in.

We believe that many institutions responded in the affirmative on behalf of their students believing that this was no more than a general indication of a likelihood that some students would cash in some results.

The fact that 75% of institutions responded in this manner tells us nothing about what individual students will actually decide to do when they know their results.

4. Accordingly, the reality is that the results to be published on 16 August, can only embrace those students who have taken 3 AS units in those centres (the 75%) which answered in the affirmative regarding cashing in at the examination entry stage.

5. This means that 25% of the centres will not be included and, in relation to the 75% that are included, many students may well decide not to cash in their results. This will lead to an inadequate and distorted picture which will be remarkably unhelpful to the new examination.

I can appreciate your Department's dilemma. The fullest possible publication of AS level results on the 16th will avoid charges of "cover up" or "lack of transparency".

But it is essential that next week's publication is accompanied by a very definite "health warning".

At the end of the day, the most important thing is that all students receive their individual results in all the AS units they have taken so they can make informed decisions about cashing in and/or re-taking units.

In view of the importance of this issue, I am copying this letter to Edexcel and to the Joint Council for General Qualifications.

Yours sincerely


See also:

08 Aug 01 | Education
'Distorted' exam results warning
Links to more Education stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Education stories