Operation Overt was a massive security operation to smash what prosecutors said was a plot to murder people using liquid bombs on planes.
Three men have been convicted of conspiracy to murder - but the jury was unable to decide whether or not they planned to target planes.
Who were the eight men who ended up on trial in Woolwich Crown Court?
GUILTY: RINGLEADER ABDULLA AHMED ALI
Abdulla Ahmed Ali said he wanted to make a documentary
Abdulla Ahmed Ali, the leader of the plot, was born in Newham, London.
He told the court he had become more politically and religiously active as a teenager, but said he was not an extremist.
An engineering graduate, he chose not to work after leaving City University in 2002, instead pursuing business opportunities in Pakistan.
In 2003 he travelled to Pakistan, in association with a British charity, and helped in refugee camps for people fleeing fighting in Afghanistan.
Married with a two-year-old son, he was shocked by "appalling" conditions in the camps, where he witnessed many people dying.
Video showing Abdulla Ahmed Ali
Later, he came to believe aid work was an ineffective way of helping, and decided to tackle what he believed was the root cause, Western foreign policy.
His defence said the plot had been an audacious stunt intended to direct public attention to a documentary intended to change opinion on foreign policy.
The "suicide videos" he and his fellow conspirators had made were to be combined with graphic footage for a documentary that they would post on Youtube, he said.
He admitted he had researched on the internet how to make an explosive device using a drinks bottle, hydrogen peroxide and batteries, but said he had had no intention of blowing up a plane, or hurting anyone.
Ali, 27, is thought to have learned his bomb-making skills in Pakistan - he was there at the same time as the leaders of the two 2005 London suicide bomb plots.
GUILTY: 'QUARTERMASTER' ASSAD SARWAR
Assad Sarwar admitted using a false name to buy hydrogen peroxide
Described as the gang's quartermaster, Sarwar was responsible for buying and hiding the bomb-making equipment, some of which he hid in woods in High Wycombe. The security services codenamed him "Rich Food" during their surveillance.
In court he denied he was part of a plot to blow up aircraft, saying suicide bombers ended up "in hell fire." He did not record a video denouncing western foreign policy.
Born and raised in High Wycombe and describing himself as "shy", Sarwar, 24, turned down a place at university in Chichester because he was homesick.
His second attempt at Brunel University, first with a sports science course, then earth sciences, also failed because he found the work too hard.
Sarwar said he suffered low self-esteem and thought he was "useless," following these failures.
He had a number of jobs including for Royal Mail, and BT, which he left as he said he could not cope with the work. Sarwar's journey can be traced from when he met Ali in Pakistan while helping at a refugee camp in early 2003 alongside fellow defendant Umar Islam.
Sarwar described Ali as having "leading characteristics," while he was of "weak character."
They met again after at lectures at an east London school and discussed the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq and were both frustrated by the numbers of refugees.
Sarwar was placed under surveillance and was seen buying household items that could be used to make bombs.
Following arrests, police recovered a tape containing martyrdom videos of six of the other men which he had hidden in his garage. During the trial he admitted learning how to make bombs while in Pakistan.
GUILTY: TANVIR HUSSAIN
Video showing Tanveer Hussain
Hussain, 27, was described as a fashion-conscious person who stayed out with friends and said his life was "just having fun."
He said he agreed to appear in an al Qaeda-style militant video, but denied it was part of a set of martyrdom films. But prosecutors say that he was a key member of the team, helping Ali at key moments of the conspiracy.
The security services watched him and Ali making devices in the bomb factory and buying tools for bomb-making. Hussain also sent coded messages to Ali in Pakistan as he researched chemical recipes for the devices.
The mystery surrounding Hussain is that he took part in the plot even though he knew that MI5 were interested in him - both he and his brother were stopped and questioned at different times.
In his defence, Hussain said that Ali, whom he knew from college, told him of his plan to make a documentary protesting against foreign policy, accompanied by a "harmless" explosive device.
He said he was "taken aback" by the plans - but said Ali told him: "It ain't going to be nothing big, just a loud bang to cause panic and alarm."
In court his defence queried whether he had asked Mr Ali if he intended to kill anyone.
Mr Hussain replied: "I didn't ask him. I know Ahmed wouldn't do nothing like that."
The following men all pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to commit a public nuisance by recording what appeared to be martyrdom videos.
The jury was unable to reach verdicts on the main charges of conspiracy to murder.
ARAFAT WAHEED KHAN
Khan's fiancee told the court that he lavished gifts on her
Prosecutors alleged that Khan was an "important conduit" between Ali and Sarwar.
The court heard he allegedly bought equipment for the bombs and made two martyrdom videos.
Born in Pakistan in 1981, he lived in Walthamstow, and went to school with Ali. He failed to complete a business course at Middlesex University.
He worked at the Link mobile phone shop, but resigned in 2006 after his branch came under investigation.
His defence said he would never have agreed to be a suicide bomber as he was engaged and planning to get married in April 2007.
Khan described his lifestyle of going out clubbing, visiting snooker halls, smoking dope and doing hard drugs such as heroin.
In February 2005 he was approached by MI5 agents who asked him to spy for them by keeping an eye on people at his local mosque.
Khan never agreed - but some time later he was stopped and interviewed when returning from Pakistan. One of the same security service officers appeared and asked him if recognised a number of people.
Khan had visited the bomb factory twice before his arrest.
Khan says he was persuaded to record a video by Ali. He said his script was prepared for him to read.
Surveillance at the house captured Ali and Tanvir Hussain complaining in strong language about Khan's performance on camera: "Absolutely shit bruv. He didn't even read it properly ¿ he didn't know what was going on ¿ just did a quick rush job."
WAHEED ZAMAN
Waheed Zaman said "at no stage" did he plan to become a terrorist
Zaman, 24, of Walthamstow, also recorded a video threatening violence against the West.
He was a former head of a student Islamic Society at London Metropolitan University.
Ali asked Zaman to record the video after they met at an east London mosque.
Zaman said he had strong political feelings and he was chosen by Ali because he was a confident public speaker.
In court when asked what the purpose of his martyrdom video was, he said it would raise public awareness of the oppression of Muslims.
He added: "It was for the government to change its foreign policy and to make the public aware that the problems happening in the UK are directly because of foreign policy.
"Not because people hate democracy, freedom and nightclubs and stuff like that."
His defence said he did not know what Ali was planning and he said the video was a "silly mistake." His main motivation had been anger over the war in Lebanon.
IBRAHIM SAVANT
Video allegedly showing Ibrahim Savant
Savant, 27, previously known as Oliver Savant, changed his name when he came to Islam in 1998 - and prosecutors claimed he was a radical obsessed with martyrdom.
The court heard the East London man had a collection of horrific DVDs, including beheadings marked "ha ha ha".
He recorded his personal video at the same time as Ali and Hussain.
Prosecutors told the court he wrote a farewell letter to his wife - but the defence said it was written soon after his marriage and had nothing to do with suicide.
In his defence Savant said he had been enlisted to make a video by Ali, who he claimed manipulated him.
Savant said he was also persuaded to make his video after he heard his friend, Waheed Zaman, would "star" in it. Ali wrote the script.
He denied he was radicalised and said he did not believe what he was saying in the video.
UMAR ISLAM
Video allegedly showing Umar Islam
Islam, 30, formerly Brian Young, became a Muslim in 2001 and later changed his name by deed poll so he could enter Saudi Arabia to perform the pilgrimage to Mecca, known as the Hajj.
The words he spoke on his video were key to the decision to move in and break up the plot, according to police sources.
Islam was a close associate of both Ali and Sarwar - and in his defence he said he was actually planning an overland trip to Pakistan with Ali and Tanvir Hussain. His wife was also pregnant at the time of his arrest.
Umar Islam was one of the seven defendants to work for a now defunct medical charity in East London, and he travelled to Pakistan with Sarwar to help with refugee relief efforts.
One defendant was found not guilty of any part in the conspiracy:
NOT GUILTY: MOHAMMED GULZAR
Gulzar met his wife at an airport
Gulzar, 26 and originally from Birmingham, was accused in court of being an "international terrorist" and "superintendent" of the plot - but he vehemently denied the charge, saying his links with the other men were entirely innocent.
The court heard Mr Gulzar had left the UK in 2002 and he spent time in both Pakistan, performing missionary work, and later South Africa.
He returned to the UK in July 2006 and was arrested at the same time as the other seven men.
Mr Gulzar denied any role in the plot or knowing what Sarwar and Ali were planning.
The defence ridiculed the picture painted of their client, saying prosecutors were presenting the defendant as a cross between Carlos the Jackal and spoof spy Austin Powers, International Man of Mystery.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Bookmark with:
What are these?