![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, March 12, 1998 Published at 18:47 GMT UK Derbyshire sinking inquiry reopens John Prescott's announcement follows surveys of the wrecked ship
The UK Government has ordered a reopening of the inquiry into the loss of the British bulk carrier Derbyshire, which went down in a typhoon off Japan in 1980.
The survey's assessors said the Derbyshire, on which 42 British crewmen and two wives lost their lives, was "unprepared to take the rigours of typhoon seas".
Showing vivid graphics of the last moments of the vessel, the assessors explained how water had flooded the bow area of the ship, causing it to sit lower in the water.
Unable to get sufficiently above 80ft waves, the vessel had its hatch covers ripped off and with the cargo area filling with water, sank rapidly.
Mr Prescott said the survey was "one of the century's greatest feats of underwater detective work" and was even more impressive than the research done on the wreck of the Titanic.
They can also suggest questions it should address, and whether the re-hearing should be held before a wreck commissioner, as was the first 1987 Derbyshire hearing, or in the High Court.
Controversy has surrounded previous attempts to find out what caused the vessel to sink. It was only after a sister ship, the Kowloon Bridge, went aground and broke up off Ireland in 1986 that the first public inquiry into the Derbyshire accident started in 1987.
Survey assessor Robin Williams explained that the tanks in the bow flooded through an opening, ventilators and an air pipe, whose covers were washed away.
There were several reasons for the sinking and the ship would not have gone down for any one of the reasons alone - it was a combination of all of them.
The vessel sank with an estimated 9,000 tonnes of water in the hold and the surveyors found "a picture of almost total destruction with parts of this huge ship ripped apart lying torn and crumpled on the sea bed".
Asked if the survey's findings vindicated the design of the ship, Mr Williams replied: "This is not a clean bill of health for the industry. We have ignored the signs and are still ignoring signs. Ships are being lost. There are no winners in this. There is a lesson for everybody in this sinking."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||