![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, January 29, 1998 Published at 07:18 GMT UK Explosion in prison population predicted ![]() By 2005 there could be almost twice as many inmates as in 1995
Up to 24 new jails, at a cost of almost £2 billion, may have to be built over
the next seven years to cope with an explosion in prison numbers, the Government
is warning.
New Home Office statistics show there will be 92,600 inmates behind bars in England and Wales by 2005 if the jail population continues to rise
at the current rate, an increase of almost 30,000 on the current total.
The figures dwarf the current expansion programme to provide an additional 9,000 places by 2001, including seven new prisons and extra house blocks at existing jails.
Although the statistics are a "worst case" scenario, even a "middle" scenario, based on an analysis of longer term trends, suggests the population will reach 82,800, requiring an extra 12 prisons costing just under £1bn.
.
"It is a very expensive programme. People ought to question whether that is
the best way to spend public money," he said.
He said that in many cases, non-custodial community sentences offered better
value for public money.
"Some of the people who come into prison could be dealt with as effectively
at a very much lower cost," he said.
The National Association of Probation Officers warned that the new Home Office
projections spelt "disaster" for the criminal justice system.
"The Government is making the same mistakes as the Americans. Custody is now
the central sentence," said NAPO assistant general secretary Harry Fletcher.
"All other punishments are becoming increasingly more punitive and therefore
more expensive without the benefits of a significant fall in crime. If the Home
Office carries on, the costs of punishment are bound to threaten education and
other budgets with appalling results."
The figures are likely to alarm Chancellor Gordon Brown and Treasury officials anxious to keep a lid on public spending.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||