Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Archive
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Wednesday, September 29, 1999 Published at 16:02 GMT 17:02 UK


UK

Lawyers 'undermine' disabled witnesses

Few abuse allegations by people with learning difficulties come to court

The kind of questions lawyers ask people with learning difficulties in court often undermine their evidence and allow their abusers to go free, say researchers.

Disability campaigners say people with learning difficulties are more likely to be victims of crime than the general public.

But attacks against them are rarely prosecuted because police do not realise they have a disability or they are not considered reliable witnesses.

This means their abusers often go unpunished which in turn makes them even more of a target.

Researchers from the University of Birmingham say that, even when cases are brought to court, it is often easy to undermine a witness because they are fed questions they find difficult to answer.

They studied the transcripts of cases which had come to court.

The researchers found that 51% of all questions asked by lawyers demanded either a yes or no answer.

Some 85% of questions asked in cross examination were of this type.

"People with learning difficulties often say yes to anything so they contradict themselves," said Dr Mark Kebbell, who presented the research to a British Psychological Society conference on Wednesday.

"This reduces their credibility."

Multiple questions

He added that another problem was lawyers who asked many questions in one question.

Studies showed members of the general public had difficulty answering these.

Often they would answer yes or no to one part of the question and ignore the other part, meaning their response could be misinterpreted.

Twelve per cent of questions lawyers asked people with learning difficulties involved negatives, for example, being asked if something 'was not the case'.

"Lawyers should not ask negative questions as people with learning difficulties do not understand them," said Dr Kebbell.

"It is better to ask them an open question like 'tell me what happened?'"

He believes many defence lawyers use these kinds of questions deliberately to undermine a witness and admits this may sometimes be justified, for example, if the initial interviews by police, social workers and carers relied on a lot of negative questions or ones requiring a yes/no answer.

"It is reasonable that they should seek to show that allegations may have been obtained by suggestion. People with learning difficulties can be very suggestible."

Taping interviews

He believes initial interviews should be taped and should use open questions so as not to lead the witness.

And he says judges should challenge the use of complicated or yes/no questions to people with learning difficulties in court.

There may even be an argument for an expert to point out to the jury that the witness may have trouble with certain types of question, he added.

Dr Kebbell thinks there is a good argument for using taped evidence in court for people with learning difficulties.

Currently, abused children are allowed to give taped evidence, but this does not apply to vulnerable adults.

"Cases take so long to get to court and people with learning difficulties often have poor memories which decay quickly. Their initial evidence to police or social workers could therefore be used as the main evidence in court," said Dr Kebbell.

The research is continuing and will compare abuse cases involving the general public with those involving people with learning difficulties to see if the latter are less likely to volunteer information or need more coaching or time to expand on points.

Mencap, the charity for people with learning difficulties, backed the findings and called for police and lawyers to be trained to deal with such cases.

Its research shows few barristers have any specialist training, but most are open to it.

A spokesman added that the government had recommended some measures, such as video link-ups so witnesses did not have to come to court, which might improve the situation.



Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©


UK Contents

Northern Ireland
Scotland
Wales
England

Relevant Stories

23 Sep 99 | Health
Disabled wait months for support schemes

14 Sep 99 | Health
Disabled young adults 'missing out on care'

21 Jun 99 | Health
Living under the shadow of bullies

20 Jun 99 | Health
Disabled complain of widespread bullying





Internet Links


Mencap

British Psychological Society

Learning difficulties links


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.




In this section

Next steps for peace

Blairs' surprise over baby

Bowled over by Lord's

Beef row 'compromise' under fire

Hamilton 'would sell mother'

Industry misses new trains target

From Sport
Quins fightback shocks Cardiff

From Business
Vodafone takeover battle heats up

IRA ceasefire challenge rejected

Thousands celebrate Asian culture

From Sport
Christie could get two-year ban

From Entertainment
Colleagues remember Compo

Mother pleads for baby's return

Toys withdrawn in E.coli health scare

From Health
Nurses role set to expand

Israeli PM's plane in accident

More lottery cash for grassroots

Pro-lifers plan shock launch

Double killer gets life

From Health
Cold 'cure' comes one step closer

From UK Politics
Straw on trial over jury reform

Tatchell calls for rights probe into Mugabe

Ex-spy stays out in the cold

From UK Politics
Blair warns Livingstone

From Health
Smear equipment `misses cancers'

From Entertainment
Boyzone star gets in Christmas spirit

Fake bubbly warning

Murder jury hears dead girl's diary

From UK Politics
Germ warfare fiasco revealed

Blair babe triggers tabloid frenzy

Tourists shot by mistake

A new look for News Online