|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, November 6, 1997 Published at 07:55 GMT UK Hamilton accused but sleaze committee divided Committee: Hamilton accepted cash
Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton is expected to be accused of accepting money in return for asking questions in Parliament by a panel which investigated his conduct.
However, it is thought that not all the committee's members will back the findings of the committee of MPs, due to be published on Thursday.
Mr Davies says it will be "the greatest travesty of justice of all" to reject Mr Hamilton's appeal without questioning his chief accuser, the Harrods owner, Mohamed Al Fayed. Mr Hamilton's request that further witnesses should be called was turned down last week.
The committee seems very likely to endorse the recommendations of the standards commissioner Sir Gordon Downey.
The committee has no power to fine Mr Hamilton or ban him from holding office again. But the findings have the potential to severely damage his reputation.
This is the first real test of Parliament's new machinery for rooting out
sleaze.
Quentin Davies says the way it has highlighted a profound crisis for self-regulation. And although the other members of the committee seem satisfied the process has been fair, they will be unhappy they could not produce a unanimous report.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||