Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point
On Air
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Monday, November 30, 1998 Published at 23:10 GMT


UK

Tatchell charged under 138-year-old law

Police officers move in to arrest Peter Tatchell

By News Online's Alex Kirby

Peter Tatchell, the homosexual rights campaigner accused of "indecent behaviour in a church", is charged under section 2 of the Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1860.

That law itself is derived from a much older one, the Brawling Act of 1551.

Canterbury magistrates' court, where Mr Tatchell's case is being heard, was offered a definition of "indecent behaviour" by the prosecuting lawyer, Robert Montague.

"The term bears no sexual connotation", Mr Montague told the court. "Section 2 of the act does forbid what it calls riotous, violent or indecent behaviour in a church.


[ image: Peter Tatchell: One of the most prominent homosexual rights campaigners]
Peter Tatchell: One of the most prominent homosexual rights campaigners
"But the way I would describe Peter Tatchell's conduct is that it was inappropriate, unseemly or indecorous."

The case against Mr Tatchell follows an incident last Easter Day, 12 April, when he and several colleagues from the campaign group OutRage! climbed up into the pulpit of Canterbury Cathedral during a service.

They interrupted the Archbishop, Dr George Carey, who was preaching his Easter sermon, in order to protest at what they called his support for discrimination against lesbians and gay men.

In 1860 - and even more in 1551 - the law was used to prevent any disturbance to a church service.

It was used much more recently than that to punish people who used a church to voice their criticisms.

In 1966 the Labour party was holding its annual conference in Blackpool. As usual, a church service was held early in the proceedings.

Several protesters, angry at the Labour government's stand on Vietnam, interrupted the service by calling out: "Oh you hypocrites ! How can you use the word of God to justify your policies ?"

One of the group was sentenced to two months in prison, the maximum sentence (with a fine of £200) possible under the act.

But some prominent secular critics, and a few Christians, say the act should be scrapped.

They have signed an appeal organised by the National Secular Society, a humanist group, which calls for the act to be repealed.

Signatories include the journalist Polly Toynbee, the writer Alan Bennett, and the former Labour leader Michael Foot.

They are concerned that the act gives the church a unique degree of protection, and an immunity to criticism which no other institution enjoys.

They say that if Peter Tatchell and his group had protested anywhere except in a church, then he could have been charged only with a public order offence, with probably a lesser penalty.

If the act is not repealed, its critics say, then it should be extended to include secular ceremonies as well, and the maximum sentence should be a fine, not imprisonment.

In 1860 the church was an important part of the British establishment, a focus of authority whose priests certainly did not expect to be interrupted or criticised in their own places of worship.

In 1998 Britain is a different society, with a different church - one that is less sure of its place in the national scheme of things, and more used to hearing critical voices raised against it.

Sending people to prison for interrupting archbishops - even if the interruption came as a rude shock to many people - no longer seems quite as natural a punishment as it used to.

And it could be a way of making martyrs - not something today's church does very often.





Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©


UK Contents

Northern Ireland
Scotland
Wales
England

Relevant Stories

01 Dec 98†|†UK
Gay rights campaigner to learn fate





In this section

Next steps for peace

Blairs' surprise over baby

Bowled over by Lord's

Beef row 'compromise' under fire

Hamilton 'would sell mother'

Industry misses new trains target

From Sport
Quins fightback shocks Cardiff

From Business
Vodafone takeover battle heats up

IRA ceasefire challenge rejected

Thousands celebrate Asian culture

From Sport
Christie could get two-year ban

From Entertainment
Colleagues remember Compo

Mother pleads for baby's return

Toys withdrawn in E.coli health scare

From Health
Nurses role set to expand

Israeli PM's plane in accident

More lottery cash for grassroots

Pro-lifers plan shock launch

Double killer gets life

From Health
Cold 'cure' comes one step closer

From UK Politics
Straw on trial over jury reform

Tatchell calls for rights probe into Mugabe

Ex-spy stays out in the cold

From UK Politics
Blair warns Livingstone

From Health
Smear equipment `misses cancers'

From Entertainment
Boyzone star gets in Christmas spirit

Fake bubbly warning

Murder jury hears dead girl's diary

From UK Politics
Germ warfare fiasco revealed

Blair babe triggers tabloid frenzy

Tourists shot by mistake

A new look for News Online