![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Published at 11:34 GMT 12:34 UK UK Make prosecutions easier, say legal experts ![]() The Law Commission wants to rid the system of anomalies Proposals to make it easier for people to bring a private prosecution are being put forward by legal experts.
The right to bring a private prosecution is seen as a fundamental constitutional safeguard against the failure of the authorities to begin criminal proceedings. The Law Commission's report found that the system under which certain offences cannot be prosecuted without the prior consent of the Attorney General, the Solicitor General or the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), was "full of anomalies".
The Law Commission found numerous anomalies. For instance, under the 1968 Theft Act the DPP's consent was required to prosecute a victim's spouse for stealing or unlawfully damaging property, but it was not required to prosecute a spouse for obtaining property by deception, wounding, committing blackmail, rape or attempted murder. The Commission has proposed a new regime to sweep away these anomalies, based on the fundamental principle that the right to bring a private prosecution fulfils a useful function and should only be circumscribed where there is good reason. Consent needed The report recommended that consent would still be justified:
However this exception would not apply to doctors accused or recklessly causing a patient's death. Although an unsuccessful private prosecution for manslaughter might damage a doctor's career, the Law Commission argues that it would be wrong to give any profession special protection. Doctors disappointed The Medical Protection Society said it was disappointed with the proposals. The society's head of policy Dr Gerard Panting told BBC News 24 that the report had failed to acknowledge the particular difficulties doctors face. "They're dealing with very complex situations, they're often dealing with situations where relatives are distraught following a sudden death, where there's been an unexpected complication," he said. Dr Panting said it was important that doctors be given expert advice as to whether a particular case warrants prosecution before it goes ahead. He suggested that the DPP or the Solicitor or Attorney Generals should look at a case before it is allowed to proceed. "Doctors must be accountable but they must also be protected against misconceived prosecution," he added. In a statement, the Law Officers' Department - representing the Attorney General John Morris QC and the Solicitor General Ross Cranston - welcomed the Law Commission's report. "There is a clear need for the rationalisation of the consent provisions which attach to certain criminal offences. "In particular, the separation of investigation and prosecution effected by the establishment in 1986 of the Crown Prosecution Service has substantially reduced the need for consent provisions," the Law Officers' Department said. The government would be considering the Law Commission's proposals as a basis for reform and would respond in due course, the statement said. |
UK Contents
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||