| You are in: UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friday, 26 April, 2002, 17:14 GMT 18:14 UK
Court of confusion
Tiring work: Relatives of the accused in court
However, during the two arduous days that 14 foreign plane spotters stood before her on spying charges this courtroom drama was seemed sometimes in danger of descending into farce. Kalamata's courthouse was an unlikely setting for a spy trial of international importance. It was dirty and disintegrating. Defendants could even be seen adding graffiti while they wait.
Crowded with British and Dutch journalists clamouring for a view of the 14 defendants, the room was even more unpleasant. It was stuffy and hot, but opening the court's few grimy windows ironically served only to allow the engines of the passing military jets at the centre of this case to interrupt proceedings. Even without this noise, hearing was difficult. Visitors to the court - press and curious locals - came and went as they pleased, with few heeding the warnings not to use their mobile phones. Long day But this hubbub was not the only difficulty. The case was conducted in three languages with the competing whispers of the several Dutch and English translators leaving themselves and everyone else confused.
"They're stopping us having a full translation of our own defence?" asked an incredulous Steve Rush. During the marathon first day of the hearing, the spotters were lucky to have any interpretation at all. During the final phase of the 16-hour sitting, the translators continually slipped into using the wrong language and unsuccessfully pleaded to be sent home. The long hours were not the judge's idea though, despite a local reputation for staying late which has earned her the nickname: the Duracell Judge. Sympathy vote Rather it was the suggestion of Stephen Jakobi, a lawyer with the British pressure group Fair Trials Abroad.
The plane-spotters' weariness "would also create sympathy for them on the bench," he said. While many of the foreign observers found the style of the hearing odd - little in the way of material evidence was exhibited and many witnesses were subjected to seemingly bizarre lines of questioning - Mr Jakobi said he was happy with the process. "I've been impressed. Everyone has had a full and proper say." Extra funds Yet confusion had reigned from the trial's outset, when the spotters were sent off to nearby cashpoints to amass an unexpected £1,000 court fee without which the judge would not sit.
There was also great indignation among the 14 when their lawyers announced they would require another £4,000 from each defendant before summing up. However, it was Judge Fotopoulou who delivered the big surprise in the final act, finding those in the dock guilty of different charges but without calling their names. Numbers not names "One, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 14 are guilty of simple espionage," the translator whispered to those within earshot. Julie Wilson, wife of Chris Wilson, one of the spotters, had been left baffled. "I had to count along the line to see that my husband wasn't one of that group." Luckily for her, he got off "lightly" with a one year-suspended sentence. |
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top UK stories now:
Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more UK stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|