BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh

 You are in: UK
Front Page 
Northern Ireland 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

Monday, 14 January, 2002, 17:05 GMT
Royal minders - policemen or parents?
Prince Harry
Prince Harry's bodyguards "behaved impeccably"
During Prince Harry's underage drinking and drug-taking exploits, why did his royal protection officers not intervene? What exactly is their job?

It is a thin, blue-ish line.

Though employed by the Metropolitan Police, a royal close protection officer, it seems, simply cannot take on the traditional role of a policeman - particularly when it comes to teenage princes.

When it emerged Prince Harry had smoked cannabis and, if much-vaunted tales from his local are true, when he drank a little more than he should, it was not his minders who spilled the beans, but instead house staff who had smelt a whiff of smoke.

The teenager's security men say they knew nothing of the goings-on that have so dominated the headlines- and it is a story Prince Charles believes.

The BBC's royal correspondent Jennie Bond said Charles did not for one moment disbelieve them.

"He thinks they behaved impeccably and cannot be blamed," she said.

Turning a blind eye

"There is no criticism from the Palace either. Prince Charles believes it is a parental matter and it should stay that way."

But questions are being asked in some quarters about what the minders should have done, had they known the youngster was breaking the law.

One close protection officer, who would not be named, said a blind eye was "regularly turned" in other areas of the profession.

royal protection officers - walking a thin line
Royal protection officers - walking a thin line
He said there were "many occasions" when he had been forced to overlook a client's "misdemeanours".

He added; "I once looked after a band - not a huge group, but certainly well-known - and there was a lot of drug-taking.

"We have a code we follow which says anything the client does is confidential but of course some may say we have a duty to report it when people flout the law.

"I never do - or I would never work again. No-one would trust me.

'Butlers with guns'

"I think the guys did the right thing here. If they did know - it is none of their business and if, as they say, they didn't, then they were obviously concentrating on security and leaving the prince's private life alone.

"That's their job after all."

SO14 - the role
the personal protection of members of The Royal Family in the UK and abroad
the physical protection of the Royal Palaces and Residences
the technical protection of all Royal Residences and Estates
the personal protection of certain members of foreign royal families visiting the UK
provision of escorts for Royalty, visiting Heads of States, other VIPs, high risk prisoners and valuable loads

The royal family's security - which usually costs around 30m a year - is looked after by SO14, the Metropolitan Police's Protection Squad, sometimes described by their Special Branch rivals as "butlers with guns".

They are a crack team of police officers charged with protecting the monarchy.

Known as the Royalty and Diplomatic Protection Department, members are responsible for personal safety and guarding royal residences.

It is unclear whether Harry's bodyguards were with him as he drank and smoked.

But in any case, said royal author Penny Junor, they only have the authority to stop the boys from doing something when it directly affected their safety.

"They are there to protect the princes from danger or assassination....not from the normal kind of episodes in growing up," she added.

Moral judgements

Prince Harry's bodyguard at the time is reportedly keeping his job since his role is about safety, not making moral judgements - a view echoed by Jennie Bond.

"They are with them constantly and do not want the royals to think Mr Plod is breathing down their necks all the time."

Scotland Yard refused to comment in detail, saying they did not discuss security issues

"We do not discuss matters of security.

"But - in relation to the weekend's revelations - our protection officers have not made any reports of security concerns, and security has not been compromised."

See also:

14 Jan 02 | UK Politics
Kennedy: Harry could prompt drug debate
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more UK stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more UK stories