|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sunday, November 30, 1997 Published at 00:54 GMT UK: Politics Backbench rebellion over benefit cuts The rebels say the benefit cuts mean lone parents who stay at home to look after small children will lose out badly
The Government has been warned that as many as 200 Labour MPs could use a vote in the Commons to rebel against plans to cut benefits to lone parents.
The MPs will vote in less than two weeks at the third reading of the Social Security Bill in an attempt to derail the proposals.
The row is the most serious in Labour Party ranks since the election.
The Social Security Secretary, Harriet Harman, said there was no possibility of the Government backing down.
"These benefit cuts have been a hard choice, but they are Tory cuts
and we have to implement them to stay within our manifesto commitment to keep within spending limits," she said.
Ms Harman tried to deflect the criticism by emphasising positive Labour initiatives for lone parents.
"The Green Budget is offering the largest ever investment in
after-school care made by government and we are also making sure that all new lone mothers coming onto income support from April next year will have the full New Deal package available to them," she said.
Pressure has been building among Labour MPs for the policy to cut benefits to be reversed. But on Monday the Chancellor chose instead to channel £400 million of savings from EU contributions into a childcare initiative aimed at helping lone parents back to work.
The rebels
Labour left-winger, Ken Livingstone MP, said: ""If these cuts go through they will be one of the most despicable acts ever in the history of Labour Governments ... even if my life depended on it I couldn't vote for it, and I know a lot of other Labour MPs feel the same way."
"I have not decided whether I will vote against or whether I will abstain, but I certainly will not vote for these cuts," she said.
Conservative Shadow Social Security Secretary, Iain Duncan-Smith said: "Labour knew, when they announced before the General Election that they would stick to Conservative spending plans, that this would mean making cuts to lone parents' benefits. Yet both Tony Blair and (Social Security Secretary) Harriet Harman publicly
stated in the weeks running up to the General Election that they would not make cuts to lone parents' benefits.
"They wouldn't admit this before the General Election for fear of losing votes," he said.
Benefit cuts
The policy, which amounts to £395 million of cuts over three years, was introduced by the last Conservative Government in its final Budget.
Key points:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||