[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Friday, 14 July 2006, 09:22 GMT 10:22 UK
Apple gives up on hunt for moles
Boy with Apple logo shaved into hair, AP
Many people are fanatical Apple watchers
Apple has ended its legal fight to make bloggers reveal who leaked secret information about its new products.

Legal action began in 2004 after details of an audio breakout box, code-named Asteroid, appeared online.

Apple won the first round of the legal battle but the order to unmask the sources was over-turned on appeal.

Now Apple has decided not to contest the appeal court ruling which gave net journalists the same protections as traditional media counterparts.

Watching brief

In 2004 Apple launched its fight to unmask the moles by filing a lawsuit against a company called NFox.com. This firm provided e-mail services to one of several Apple-watching blogs that published information about Asteroid and other forthcoming products.

In the lawsuit Apple also tried to make the blogs, Apple Insider and Power Page, reveal their sources.

Apple argued that the only way that someone could have passed on the information, which included detailed drawings, was by breaking a confidentiality agreement.

Apple is famously tight-lipped about future products but is such an influential firm that many keep a close eye on what it is working on.

In a legal decision handed down in December 2004, a Santa Clara Superior Court Judge sided with Apple and said that there was no legal protection for the bloggers who published the information.

The case went to appeal and the 2004 decision was over-turned in May 2006 with the help of digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

The EFF argued that if Apple was successful the ability of all journalists to use information from confidential sources would be compromised.

While the appeal court did not agree with the EFF on this point it said that online journalists and bloggers deserved the same protections as colleagues who publish in newspapers.

Now the deadline for Apple to contest this appeal ruling has passed and legal papers filed by the computer maker suggest it will not pursue the matter any further.

A separate trade secrets lawsuit that Apple filed against another site - Think Secret - has yet to be resolved.


SEE ALSO
'iPod rival' speculation dampened
07 Jul 06 |  Technology
Is Apple feeling the heat?
10 Jul 06 |  Technology
Why we are all journalists now
05 Jun 06 |  Technology
US court backs online reporters
30 May 06 |  Technology
Apple bloggers get press support
12 Apr 05 |  Technology
Apple makes blogs reveal sources
16 Mar 05 |  Technology

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific