[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Tuesday, 11 May, 2004, 10:53 GMT 11:53 UK
US criticised over web controls
Guard in Washington
Security concerns led to the censorship of many official sites
The US should reopen most of the sites shut down after September 11 because of terrorism fears, a report says.

The government-funded study found that the vast majority of official sites and databases posed little security risk.

In the aftermath of September 11, the US authorities shut down some 36 sites and more than 600 public databases.

But the report by the Rand Corporation concluded that details about potential targets like airports and power plants, was readily available elsewhere.

The September 11 attacks prompted a debate on access to information on the internet.

In the weeks that followed, the US Government, some organisations and some commercial sites removed or modified information on their websites for fear that the data might be used to launch other attacks.

Some of the information that disappeared from official US websites related to hazardous chemicals.

Other data removed related to information that could help enemies of the US identify targets and plan attacks, such as the location of military bases, pipelines and power plants.

'Knee-jerk' reaction

The report, Mapping the Risks, by the Rand Corporation suggests that the censorship of the web in the months after September 11 was ill-advised.

Boston airport
Some of the data taken offline was about airports
The researchers looked at 5,000 federal web pages for the study. They found that none of the sites offered any information that was essential to a terrorist.

In any case, much of the data could be found in textbooks, non-government sites, trade journals or maps.

The same applied to virtually all of the 629 officials databases the researchers looked at.

In only four cases was there an argument to restrict prevent public access. These four databases had details about pipelines, nuclear reactors and dams.

The report appears to justify those who accused the Bush administration of acting rashly due to terrorist fears.

"It was a gigantic mistake, and I hope the study brings some rationality back to this policy," said Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists' project on government secrecy.

"Up to now, decisions have been made on a knee-jerk basis."




SEE ALSO:
MI5 terror website grabs 3m hits
05 May 04  |  Politics
Spooks turn to hi-tech geography
30 Jan 04  |  Technology
US probes online terror talk
14 Jan 04  |  Middle East
Q&A: Online terror chatter
15 Jan 04  |  Middle East
US tightens controls on websites
22 Mar 02  |  Science/Nature
Intelligence data pulled from websites
05 Oct 01  |  Science/Nature


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific