| You are in: Talking Point: Debates: South Asian | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, 1 November, 2001, 16:27 GMT
Clash of cultures or fight for democracy?
The events of September 11th and the subsequent attacks on Afghanistan have brought the relationships between different countries and their governments under intense scrutiny.
Many believe that the clash of cultures explains the underlying cause of the current conflict. But others see a struggle being played out in the political sphere between democratic and non-democratic forms of governance. Have politicians and analysts misread this current crisis? And does this explain why there seems to be no clear strategy for dealing with the future of Afghanistan and its people? A World Today debate on this subject will be broadcast on BBC World Service Radio on Thursday 1st November at 0045 and 0245 GMT. A selection of your e-mails will be read out during the debate and daily on the programme leading up to the debate at 0040 and 0240 GMT. This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.
There are strong similarities between the struggles and problems in the Muslim world and those of Europe less than a hundred years ago. Ordinary Muslims see the West as being part of their problems because of prior or current support for unpopular rulers. Western governments must learn the lessons of history and promote democracy and freedom around the world.
The current confrontation appears to be both due to a 'clash' of cultures and serious misunderstanding and misinterpretation of religious norms and values. Besides, another major factor is the tussle between the 'haves and have-nots' which is by and large responsible both for causing the rifts between cultures and the dominant religions -Christianity and Islam.
Peter, Netherlands
The culture of a people is something very basic to human beings and can never be wiped out. However, democracy and governance are forms of government and should recognise and respect the cultures for whom these are meant. Many of the world's problems are the result of arbitrariness in "governance" for short-term gains instead of for the long term.
"Clash of cultures" theory assumes that Muslim citizens are free. In most Muslim countries the majority voice is squelched by non-democratic extremist regimes.
Repeated US assertion of its self-interests also gives the impression that all non-US-citizens are less important. This anger is impossible to cure unless USA softens, which will cause it to lose its world dominance. Since USA cannot afford to soften, this anger will always be hijacked by any dominant force that is against USA. Formerly it was the Soviet Union. Now it is China. The latest and the most dangerous is militant Islam. The force of poverty that the Communists and Socialists harnessed lost momentum as people realized the impracticality of those systems. Socialism doesn't discourage people from thinking for themselves. On the other hand, the force of a religion, particularly a rigid religion like Islam, will only gather momentum. The reason is most people are too lazy to think.
This situation appears as though it is a clash of civilizations. The only long-term solution is to encourage the liberation of Islam, by forward thinking Muslims. Also a more responsible development of the world by the West will be needed. USA-made potato chips and Coca-Cola should not be thrust on poor countries in the name of opening up markets.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more South Asian stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|